I hope you find this funny. I know I did:
http://www.amazingaustralia.com.au/kiwi_jokes.htm
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
OK, understood!
Still, as mentioned elsewhere...
Different Company Cultures of communicating things, that's all, we're seeing...
And, yes, sadly, that's generating confusion and uncertainty...
Matthias
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Erlan Sergaziev erlan.sergaz...@gmail.com
An:
Hi
I'm having a problem with my OSOL 133, it doesn't get beyond the
progress/scan bar.
There is a lot of network activity and nothing else.
I've seen the problem a few time before on previous versions, usually
disabling the network or doing a power cut and boot up made the
problem go away.
This
On 04/16/10 09:48 PM, Henry Pepper wrote:
Hi
I'm having a problem with my OSOL 133, it doesn't get beyond the
progress/scan bar.
There is a lot of network activity and nothing else.
I've seen the problem a few time before on previous versions, usually
disabling the network or doing a power cut
Please. please please guys, osol-friends and discussers, would you all
please come back to a professional communication and cooperation and
state and comment busineeslike and objective.
Please, stop insulting people wheter it is or not your opinion, stop the
offenses, personal affronts,
Supplied without comment!
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/16/oracle_solaris_nehalem_ex/
snip.
In the absence of shipping Nehalem-EX iron, Oracle is talking up how
OpenSolaris, the development version of Solaris, has been tweaked so it
can support some of the new features in the
I'm considering getting a cute little netbook for vacation use
(something smaller than my W500), and can get a real good deal on an
Ideapad S10-3, which is an Atom N450 with 2GB ram.
How (un?)well will OpenSolaris run on this hardware?
//Svein
--
The bad attitude of the official discussions here causes heise to snear.
Sorry, it is in german:
I read German. The article is largely about Oracle's lack of openness. Nothing
in the article leads me to believe that people expressing on this forum their
unease resulting from Oracle's failure
Supplied without comment!
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/16/oracle_solaris
_nehalem_ex/
snip.
In the absence of shipping Nehalem-EX iron, Oracle is
talking up how
OpenSolaris, the development version of Solaris, has
been tweaked so it
can support some of the new features
Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about
forking this project to save it from the hands of
[b]HOracle[/b] the multi-headed, voracious, open
source devouring monster. So, when and who might be
the first step/person to make this happen to protect
what has been done so far?
Been
http://www.businessweek.com/idg/2010-04-15/opensolaris-leaders-unnerved-by-oracle-silence.html
Right ON !!!, brothers and sisters, ...
:)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Hi,
were the Toshiba preinstalled OpenSolaris laptops discontinued? I was
planning about getting one later this year but now i can't find them anymore.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On 16/04/2010 15:10, Edward Martinez wrote:
were the Toshiba preinstalled OpenSolaris laptops discontinued?
From the wording on this page, it would appear so:
http://www.opensolaris.com/toshibanotebook/
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer Oracle Corporation, Ireland
I believe that 2010.03 will be released when some critical bugs
(http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/indiana-discuss/2010-April/017812.html)
will be fixed - probably in b138
(http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/indiana-discuss/2010-April/017814.html)
- but it's not an official info, just
I'd switch to the forked version immediately. In all honesty, who wouldn't like
to see Oracle out of this equation. It could be very healthy for OpenSolaris or
whatever it'll be called when forked.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
What are you going to do with the fork? Solaris is dependent on the
briliant engineers from what was Sun, no external coders have stepped
upp and supplied many new features, mainly fixes only.
You sure can make your own distro but I'll think the only way forward
for the success of
I'd like to see it. I'm currently running my master backend in Xvm under
Ubuntu. It works very well with NFS handling the recordings storage. As it can
be CPU heavy, I'd consider running it under OpenSolaris to avoid any overhead
from virtualization. I use HDHomeRun for the tuner, so no need
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:55:46 +1200, Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
On 04/16/10 09:48 PM, Henry Pepper wrote:
Hi
I'm having a problem with my OSOL 133, it doesn't get beyond the
progress/scan bar.
There is a lot of network activity and nothing else.
I've seen the problem a few time
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:57:43 +0200, Svein Skogen sv...@stillbilde.net
wrote:
I'm considering getting a cute little netbook for vacation use
(something smaller than my W500), and can get a real good deal on an
Ideapad S10-3, which is an Atom N450 with 2GB ram.
How (un?)well will OpenSolaris
i was able to compile asterisk 1.6.2.6 it runs. it comes up. but, is not
fully configured.
at the moment, i am trying to get the zaptel ztdummy drivers the thralling
peguin site has drivers, but they won't compile on opensolaris 2009.06 says u
need solaris 7 or higher.
--
This message
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Giovanni Tirloni gtirl...@sysdroid.comwrote:
As some Oracle employees have already pointed out, that distribution is
*their* product. If that's the true spirit of things, it would make sense
why commits are not public and they probably see integrating the
Hello,
Something is brewing:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b138/
~ Ken
--- On Fri, 4/16/10, Giovanni Tirloni gtirl...@sysdroid.com wrote:
From: Giovanni Tirloni gtirl...@sysdroid.com
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] b137 based on tonic or otherwise
To: Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:31 PM, ken mays maybird1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
Something is brewing:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b138/
That's good news but it doesn't answer the hard questions in my two previous
emails.
It's like throwing a bone.
--
Giovanni
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Henrik Johansson henr...@henkis.net wrote:
What are you going to do with the fork? Solaris is dependent on the briliant
engineers from what was Sun, no external coders have stepped upp and
supplied many new features, mainly fixes only.
I see this as slap into
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:19 PM, I. Szczesniak iszczesn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Henrik Johansson henr...@henkis.net wrote:
What are you going to do with the fork? Solaris is dependent on the briliant
engineers from what was Sun, no external coders have stepped upp
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:31 PM, ken mays maybird1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
Something is brewing:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b138/
I wouldn't take it as a sign of something exceptional - nothing new here.
There are also b135, b136, b137 as well as almost any previous build.
This
calum,
why on every post that you include a hyperlink it gets clipped and the only
thing we see is just the http://;
just a question since we can never go to the links you provide.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
On 17/04/2010 01:37, Chad Welsh wrote:
calum,
why on every post that you include a hyperlink it gets clipped and
the only thing we see is just the http://;
just a question since we can never go to the links you provide.
Who is 'we', and how are you reading my emails? The links show up just
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Calum Benson calum.ben...@oracle.comwrote:
On 17/04/2010 01:37, Chad Welsh wrote:
calum,
why on every post that you include a hyperlink it gets clipped and
the only thing we see is just the http://;
just a question since we can never go to the links you
We've been talking with both our Sun salesman and HP. It appears that support
for Sun hardware will be priced at 12% of net purchase price (i.e. after
discount) for both hardware and software support, and 8% for just software.
There will be only one class or service, namely high class. We don't
Darn, it does sound like they were discontinued.
On 16/04/2010 15:10, Edward Martinez wrote:
were the Toshiba preinstalled OpenSolaris
laptops discontinued?
From the wording on this page, it would appear so:
http://www.opensolaris.com/toshibanotebook/
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
I don't know why but I
expected that the release build to be available in
the Mercurial repository after it gets released.
$ hg clone -r b111b ssh://anon at hg dot opensolaris dot org/hg/onnv/onnv-gate
abort: unknown revision 'b111b'!
So no, you cannot build previous releases of the
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.orgwrote:
On 04-14-10, Paul Gress pgr...@optonline.net wrote:
I don't think he wants to start a new distro, he's looking to
publishb137.
That's about it in a nutshell. I have no shortage of build servers and thus
I was
33 matches
Mail list logo
