Am 26.07.2010 05:35, schrieb Edward Martinez:
We've run XEN here on b134 very successfully, and it
...
The production test environment is all on XENs now.
I'm not very fond about xen virtualization because, if the hypervisor has
bugs it might bring the entire stack down( host OS
You (Volker A. Brandt) wrote:
What about Sun xVM Ops Center or whatever it was called?
xVM Server for x86.. Never been a product... Even during Sun days,
management
decided, it's easier to have the management OUTSIDE the product... So, noew
you can use OVM Manager, or possibly
You (Florian Manschwetus) wrote:
Am 26.07.2010 05:35, schrieb Edward Martinez:
I'm not very fond about xen virtualization because, if the hypervisor
has bugs it might bring the entire stack down( host OS along with the
guest) where as if virtualization was being done through
Am 28.07.10 11:40, schrieb Matthias Pfützner:
[...]
So, in order to minimize that problem, thin hypervisors have been
designed,
like Xen. Idea is: Less code, less faults. Compare VMware vs. Xen, and you'll
understand, what I'm talking about... In VMware, there's way more code (as it
is a thick
From: Joerg Schilling [mailto:joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
Joerg, I'm going to recommend xz instead of (or in addition to)
bzip2. It's
much faster and compresses better. My experience is 2x faster and 2x
better
compression.
Oh - Specifically if you use compression level 1.
Hi,
I just installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 snv_111b X86 and when I log in via ssh I
see in processes list (`ps ef`):
./jre/bin/java -classpath .:Popup.jar:GUI.jar Popup.Communicator
There is no one logged via keyb/mice or service processor.
Whats that? Whats it for?
Thanks!
/M
--
This message
I've noticed over the last couple years that with every version of OpenSolaris,
from 2008.05 through build 134, at times my root crontab spontaneously deletes
every line from the last comment (# symbol) and above. Only the lines below
the last # remain. No, not just the comments disappear,
You (Justin Lee Ewing) wrote:
Those are good points. I'm not opposed to going
with Oracle VM but keeping Xvm in Solaris would have
allowed so many more consolidation opportunities.
Agreed! But it would have required a Product... and
OpenSolaris, the binary
distribution never really
Can you go through the cron log and figure out exactly when it does this?
Do you leave your system up all the time or are you shutting it down?
what does your /etc/cron.d/FIFO look like. Is it a pipe 600 root root?
I have never seen something randomly remove cron entries.
--
This message posted
Hi All,
On behalf of the Nexenta project, I'd like to announce the
availability of the Nexenta Core Platform 3.0 RC3.
You can download the latest iso image from
http://www.nexenta.org/projects/site/wiki/DownloadUnstable
The main changes over the RC2 release include:
* ON fixes backported to
On 07/28/10 09:27 AM, William Bauer wrote:
I've noticed over the last couple years that with every version of
OpenSolaris, from 2008.05 through build 134, at times my root crontab
spontaneously deletes every line from the last comment (# symbol) and
above. Only the lines below the last #
This suggestion of relabeling the 1TB disks using an EFI label doesn't work
for me --- when OpenSolaris produces the disk has 2930277168 blocks, which is
too large for a 32-bit kernel error, it doesn't register any block devices for
that disk, so there's no way to specify to format -e which
interesting...
excerpt:
Oracle has shut down servers Sun Microsystems was contributing to the build
farm for open source database software, PostgreSQL, forcing enthusiasts to
scramble to find new hosts to test updates to their software on the Solaris
operating system
Yes. NWAM can handle static addresses as well. I
was running it using
the 'edit /etc/nwam/llp' file. But with latest build,
that is not working.
sysidtool-net on a default install (b134) seems to run DHCP client *after* nwam
has run.
a quick and dirty is to add an exit 0 to
I appear to be getting between 2-9MB/s reads from individual disks in my zpool
as shown in iostat -v
I expect upwards of 100MBps per disk, or at least aggregate performance on par
with the number of disks that I have.
My configuration is as follows:
Two Quad-core 5520 processors
48GB ECC/REG
Also w/a Raidz(4 disk) + Raidz2 (8 disk) configuration thats slow as molasses
on reads . So would love to hear any troubleshooting tips / guides etc?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
I'm kinda embarrassed to chime in since I can't help much, but I'm curious
about this.
What is your OS version, and what are the zpool and zfs versions? Can you
provide a relatively straight-forward method to reproduce your results? I'd
like to see how you're testing this for my own
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ken Gunderson
Which confirms what we've been seeing ever since the take over - run,
don't walk, away from Oracle product stack.
So why are you still here?
18 matches
Mail list logo
