Jouko Holopainen wrote:
The firefox freezes completely (unkillble process, must force shutdown) in
b134.
Now I'm investigating if swap (on zfs on sd disk) might be part of problem.
I've seen this behavior on snv_132 using an sd disk as well (running
nightly builds, nothing interactive).
On 03/13/10 22:04, James Carlson wrote:
On 03/13/10 22:44, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Sounds a lot like the ptmx permissions bug in the release notes actually,
which is fixable with a simple chmod.
Really?
The comments in that bug (particularly #26) seem to state that this was
fixed in build
Che Kristo wrote:
Isn't the community bug repo currently http://defect.opensolaris.org/ ???
Last I checked ON issues are still tracked in bugster...
Steve
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Che Kristo wrote:
Correct, hopefully not for too much longer
Why? I guess I'm not firm believer in the 'bugster sucks' philosophy...
Until ON moves over and webrev supports linking to Bugzilla, I don't see
a compelling reason to transition.
Steve
___
Any ideas on when this issue might be addressed? In the meantime, what
is the best method for creating a new bugster entry?
Steve
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
All,
I have been having fits with NFS mounts after lu'ing to snv_110 (and
snv_109) from snv_99. The NFS server is a Linux based NAS using
vers=3,proto=tcp.
Once luactivate is used and an init 6 is issued, NFS exports will mount,
however I am unable to write using a valid UID. If I luactivate the
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Steven Stallion sstall...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I have been having fits with NFS mounts after lu'ing to snv_110 (and
snv_109) from snv_99. The NFS server is a Linux based NAS using
vers=3,proto=tcp.
Once luactivate is used and an init 6
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Steven Stallion sstall...@gmail.com wrote:
As a workaround it works if you force server and client to use NFS version
2.
Ouch. Do you happen to have a bugster ID
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Steven Stallion sstall...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Martin.
I added 'subtree_check' to rw exports in /etc/exports on the Linux NAS
and everything is back to normal (using NFSv3 TCP).
Its a pain to manually hack the options since
Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
You got Solaris U6 to install on the Dell T105?
When I boot the latest official Solaris 10 U6 on my Dell T105, it boots just
fine but the install fails saying it cannot read the DVD.
It seems to be an issue with the new SATA drivers.
I don't understand
Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote:
The Dell uses the MCP55 Pro.
I thought it supported AHCI due to some messages from the kernel, but
evidently it doesn't, or does not do so completely.
That's probably the issue.
However, it seems like there should be some way to work around this, in both
Sebastien Roy wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 21:29 -0500, Steven Stallion wrote:
Limin Li wrote:
Hello all
I just installed open solaris about a week ago and now I am trying to get
internet working on this thing and it is not working obviously. On IRC, a
guy told me to ping 192.168
Limin Li wrote:
Hello all
I just installed open solaris about a week ago and now I am trying to get
internet working on this thing and it is not working obviously. On IRC, a
guy told me to ping 192.168.*.* does not work. I don't think solaris is
recognizing my nic card period. I am on
Have you tried issuing 'svcadm enable -r datalink-management' ?
Harry Fu wrote:
Jan Friedel wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 07:09:19AM -0700, Harry Fu wrote:
I installed snv_93 on a Dell PC, today after rebooting with init 6, the
system stopped with errors of
(Nit: That is unless you expect your player to support DAAP...)
I would strongly suggest using SFE (http://pkgbuild.sf.net), the
blastwave packages were significantly out of date last I checked.
Sergio Enrique Schvezov wrote:
Rallavagu wrote:
What are the available options to play Music/DVD
When I used to install Solaris 8 I could create a minimal install of about
300MB.
How can I do the same with OpenSolaris 2008.05 ?
When I boot the live cd then click to install, it tells me the minimum is
3GB.
Last I checked, the only way to accomplish something like this is to
install
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:11:50 +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wonder, does anyone uses xVM in a production environment. Is it
stable and fast enough to use it instead linux+xen?
Depends on your meaning of 'production'.
I have a proof of concept Ultra 24 dedicated
Tony Ambrozie wrote:
Hi,
I am getting a showmount: /nodename/: RPC: Program not registered
error in both the global zone and the local zone(s). The error in the
local zone prevents a clean shutdown (zlogin /zonename/ shutdown). I do
not use NFS. The release is b64 on x86. Any
A minor nit:
Section 508 applies to software which Federal agencies develop,
procure, maintain, or use electronic and information technology.
Sun (or any other publicly traded company) is not required by law to
conform to Section 508 unless they desire to provide their
software/services to the
Alan DuBoff wrote:
This is good to know. Although I haven't got a new system in quite some
time, and don't have any with Vista (most of my systems don't even have
windows on them;-). This could save me a lot of time/grief when I do run
across one.
The one that gives me fits is the
if there is one. I'd be interested in knowing as well if
there is some issue other than the 64-bit kernel just requiring a lot
more time booting.
Hope that helps.
- Original Message
From: Steven Stallion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Wednesday
Sorry for the self-reply, but I thought of one more detail that may be
useful:
After the system is installed, if I boot into failsafe, the long pause
does not occur.
Steve
Steven Stallion wrote:
All,
For quite some time now, I have run snv builds through VMware
Workstation 5 6 without any
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:34:08 +1300, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do you want to do a mock-up of what that might look like? I fear (and
this
is
purely an uninformed guess) that you're only going to alienate *more*
users than
you'll make happy.
This sounds like a solution looking
Peter Lees wrote:
looks like the download /or concat didn't work properly.
it's weird that i was able to mount the iso image but that some files were
damaged.
fixed now
Hmm. I just fired up a new VMware instance to install b74 and I am
having quite a bit of trouble getting it
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:36:25 -0700, Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
Basically, you'll find an SS10 violates the assumptions upon which ZFS
was designed - fast cpus, lots of memory bandwidth. My guess is that
you would be quite lucky to get anywhere close to 20MB/sec...
When new
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Actually, no.
ZFS works best with 64bit CPUs (and I can testify to that with
issues I've had on i386 PCs), so getting it to run on SPARCv8
systems is goint to mean a compromise in performance for
ZFS vs what you'll see with UltraSPARC and amd64.
Darren
No
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:29:41 -0700, Hugh McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I guess the OP's goal is to run this on the Infrant ReadyNAS box, not an
old Sun box. See www.infrant.com. This appears to come with 256MB of
memory (not enough for install, but maybe doable later). However the
64MB
All,
I'm curious if there are any other community members out there who would be
interested in taking up the proverbial torch and work on sparc v8 ON port.
Essentially, my interest in this is aimed towards the embedded sector.
Infrant's ReadyNAS series uses a modified v8 processor and I cant
Honestly, these arguments have floated around for years. I am not a bash
lover either, but lets be honest - changing the default root shell from
/sbin/sh to something like bash is well... silly.
That doesnt mean that sh could not be modernized a bit.
Bash is and most likely always will be an
+1
--
Steven Stallion
Project Leader
OpenSolaris Ports Collection
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
operating environment. Solaris is POSIX compliant. What gives?
Finally:
Perhaps the question you seek is: 'how can I *correct* the tools that I
wish to use such that I can build ON in a Linux sandbox?'
Regards,
Steven Stallion
Project Leader
OpenSolaris Ports Collection
Thanks Dennis, I forgot myself.
Apologies to all.
Steve
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Call me a glutton for punishment, but I am more than a little curious at
this point...
Can I step in and add a perspective here ?
I have been here since day zero and I have seen a LOT of email fly by.
,
Steven Stallion
Project Leader
OpenSolaris Ports Collection
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hmm. What chipset does the Ultra 20 use then? I was under the impression
that it was the same base board as the Tyan S2865 which sports an
nForce4 Ultra.
Im currently using an ASUS A8N-E which uses the same chipset as the Tyan.
Steve
themelon wrote:
You are using the generic ATA driver.
Have you tried using the OSS sound drivers for solaris?
http://www.4front-tech.com/solaris.html
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
[Solaris] installed okay on mine (ASUS M2N SLI Deluxe).
It's only handling
he SATA ports in legacy mode and not supporting
hot-swap on them, but
that's not AM2-related that I
Its certainly something to take a look at. I know JDS is being built via
pkgbuild currently.
Thanks for the heads up,
Steve
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I have. There are a few problems I have found using portage. I'll list them
below:
* Python based (again, would require additional packages not part of the base
install to use)
* USE flags hinder more than help. For example, if you have a global USE set to
include GTK+ support and not QT, then
the software companion installed (read: binary distribution).
SteveOn 10/9/06, Dave Marquardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven == Steven Stallion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From above:Steven I would like to propose a solaris ports system loosely based
Steven on darwinports functionality
From above:
I would like to propose a solaris ports system loosely based on darwinports
functionality. There are of course changes I would like to see made: support
for different compiler sets (gcc vs. sun), support for solaris packages, and a
shift from TCL to C, and the abillity to rely on
Greetings all,
One of the largest headaches of running a desktop solaris box is the lack of
support for source built/binary packages. Blastwave.org is the current favorite
(or so it seems), but it still very lacking in terms of variant support and
several packages have fallen by the wayside
40 matches
Mail list logo
