On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, [UTF-8] Jürgen Keil wrote:
Issue 2: CPU type is not derived correctly -- hard code/`uname -p`
-bash-3.00$ grep -n "^cpu" configure
29:cpu=`uname -m`
Under Solaris, `uname -m` returns the hardware
architecture:
$ uname -m
sun4u
I'd say that's not a problem, because two li
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Dragan Cvetkovic wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, [UTF-8] J?rgen Keil wrote:
Apropos qemu, does it work for you on b16 or b17, x86
platform?
[snip]
when compiled with /opt/csw/gcc3/bin/gcc it starts, but does nothing. No
windows opens, and after some 10-15 minutes of frene
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Victor Feng wrote:
The smpatch analyze, smpatch download worked last week. Today, they always give error message
"response code was 500", and the log message says "can not create cache
downloader".
There were some issues with the infrastructure that runs
updateserver.su
I noticed some odd smpatch behavior today, and was curious if any folks
have run into this. When I run smpatch with the analyze option, it returns
with a "Response code was 500" error:
# smpatch analyze
Response code was 500
The smpatch utility also produces the following errors in the system
