On 26/10/2007, Brandorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/26/07, John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandorr wrote:
It seems this discussion is not leading anywhere. And Sun is doing
what Sun is going to do.
So, lead it where you want it to go. Make a proposal!
Don't just sit
On 10/26/07, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/10/2007, Brandorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want the following distros to coexist:
SolarisNG, OpenSolaris Distro - Indiana
Belenix, OpenSolaris Distro - SolarisNG with KDE (or whatever Moinak
and team want to do)
Nexenta,
On 10/26/07, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/10/2007, Brandorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/26/07, John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandorr wrote:
It seems this discussion is not leading anywhere. And Sun is doing
what Sun is going to do.
So, lead it where
If you're talking about i18n and the sparc dissasembler, I'm sure you
know that these are the process of being replaced.
The Sparc dissassembler work was done by Jason King within the
infrastructure at Blastwave. So that is pretty far outside the Sun
firewalls.
I don't know about the i18n
On 26/10/2007, Brandorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/26/07, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/10/2007, Brandorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/26/07, John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandorr wrote:
It seems this discussion is not leading anywhere. And Sun is doing
Brandorr wrote:
so again I ask you - please make a counter proposal. Be part of
the solution!
Proposal: No distro will be named OpenSolaris.
I updated the wiki to include this
John's proposal, as I understand, is that only people/teams that can
use the OpenSolaris trademark as a
Brandorr wrote:
A compatibility test, that says, verify that this is the same exact
set of bits is an audit, not a compatibility test. You are defining
compatibility in such a way that only the thing being tested against
As the one who wrote those words, along with an email stating that:
What
