Brian Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Gupta writes:
http://www.cups.org/articles.php?L179+I0+T+M10+P1+Q
Ah, a license fork. What fun!
...
Personally I think this is a complete perversion of the open source
movement, and can't
Brian Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Brian Gupta writes:
http://www.cups.org/articles.php?L179+I0+T+M10+P1+Q
Ah, a license fork. What fun!
...
Personally I think this is a complete perversion of
the open source
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
the issues experienced trying to setup printers in Solaris, its a
nightmare
One thing I wouldn't mind seeing is CUPS + Gutenprint + Foomatic - given
Foomatic and Gutenprint are in Solaris today. Foomatic is reasonably
current, but could use an update. We are in the
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 12:12 -0500, Norm Jacobs wrote:
Windows hosted printers should work from Solaris Nevada. If you bring
up the printmgr and add a New Network Printer, you should be able to
select URI for the protocol, and set the destination to an SMB uri
(smb://window-box/printer).
Windows hosted printers should work from Solaris Nevada. If you bring
up the printmgr and add a New Network Printer, you should be able to
select URI for the protocol, and set the destination to an SMB uri
(smb://window-box/printer). Since Windows expects the client side to
generate printer
I heard that they bought cups but stated that:
Apple Inc. has trademarked the Common UNIX Printing System, CUPS, and CUPS
logo. These names and logos may be used freely in any direct port or binary
distribution of CUPS. To use them in derivative products, please contract Apple
Inc. for written
http://www.cups.org/articles.php?L179+I0+T+M10+P1+Q
On 7/30/07, Ché Kristo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heard that they bought cups but stated that:
Apple Inc. has trademarked the Common UNIX Printing System, CUPS, and
CUPS logo. These names and logos may be used freely in any direct port or
On 7/30/07, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Gupta writes:
http://www.cups.org/articles.php?L179+I0+T+M10+P1+Q
Ah, a license fork. What fun!
Personally I think this is a complete perversion of the open source
movement, and can't believe this hasn't gotten wider coverage...
Brian Gupta writes:
http://www.cups.org/articles.php?L179+I0+T+M10+P1+Q
Ah, a license fork. What fun!
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N
A couple of weeks ago, Mike announced that Apple bought CUPS back in
February and is now employing him. From what I read, Mike will be
working on something other than CUPS (don't know what) at Apple, but
will still be supporting CUPS. As for forking the code... For a while
now, the
Here's the basic truth about Apple and OpenSource:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200602/apple.html
-Brian
On 7/30/07, Norm Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of weeks ago, Mike announced that Apple bought CUPS back in
February and is now employing him. From what I read, Mike will be
That doesn't paint a particularly pleasant picture. Let's hope, for the
sake of those that have bet the farm on CUPS, that it maintains a more
independent status. I don't expect that anything can disappear from it
or that there will be a significant fork, but the Open Source community
*may*
Brian Gupta wrote:
Here's the basic truth about Apple and OpenSource:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200602/apple.html
The first half-dozen paragraphs, describing the obstacles facing
external developers when the Apple source was still reasonably open,
seem eerily familiar.
s/Apple/Sun/g
Scott Rotondo wrote:
Brian Gupta wrote:
Here's the basic truth about Apple and OpenSource:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200602/apple.html
The first half-dozen paragraphs, describing the obstacles facing
external developers when the Apple source was still reasonably open,
seem
Tom Haynes writes:
Scott Rotondo wrote:
The first half-dozen paragraphs, describing the obstacles facing
external developers when the Apple source was still reasonably open,
seem eerily familiar.
[...]
With the exception that Sun is trying to open things up. I.e., an
external person
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 00:29 -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
They have forked a closed source version for Mac OS X
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
One thing I wouldn't mind seeing is CUPS + Gutenprint + Foomatic -
Note that No developer is required to provide these exceptions in a derived
work.
So as copyright holder Apple is reserving compliance with GPL when applied to
their own operating system's but this exception does not have to be extended
when a develepor distributes his/her derived work. So
They have forked a closed source version for Mac OS X
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
18 matches
Mail list logo
