Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version,

2008-05-14 Thread Michael A. Nunes
To Brandon: Based upon your message here I considered purchasing a 690G based motherboard, but when I investigated further I was unable to find any such motherboard that had 6xSATA connectors. Can you please tell me which motherboards you were able to find that have 6xSATA and are based upon 69

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version,

2008-05-14 Thread Brandon High
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Michael A. Nunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Based upon your message here I considered purchasing a 690G based > motherboard, but when I investigated further I was unable to find any such > motherboard that had 6xSATA connectors. Can you please tell me which >

[osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-12 Thread Runar Bell
Hi, I am in need of a NAS at home, I am currently running Linux (ubuntu), but I would like to have a look at opensolaris and especially ZFS and Zones. My problem is that I don't really know what hardware to buy, since the HCL (http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl) does not contain the hardware I wan

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-14 Thread Curt Rebelein, Junior
I just went though this myself a few weeks ago. I documented the process in a few blog entries -> https://rebby.com/blog.php?detail=35 # contains exact hardware details https://rebby.com/blog.php?detail=34 # contains install/config details (not yet complete, still adding LU and iSCSI documenta

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-15 Thread RBell
Thanks for the reply, any help is welcome :) Your setup differs a little bit from mine, most significantly because you have a E-ATX motherboard with PCI-X, I want to use a microATX since they come with on-board vga, but they only have PCI and PCI-Express. I also would like to use a cheap s-ata

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-15 Thread Brandon High
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Runar Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MoBo: MicroATX, preferrably AM2+ and with 6 s-ata connectors and support of > at least 8GB RAM. > S-ATA controller: Something really cheap, most likely with a SiL3114 chip. Consider the Supermicro DAC-SATA-MV8 - 8 ports, a

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-15 Thread Joe Little
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Runar Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am in need of a NAS at home, I am currently running Linux (ubuntu), but I > would like to have a look at opensolaris and especially ZFS and Zones. My > problem is that I don't really know what hardware to buy, sin

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-22 Thread RBell
I've discovered that Nexanta is not an option: NexentaStor Developer Edition is time-unlimited and full feature product that can be deployed with up to one terabyte of user data. I plan to use way more than 1TB. (For instance to keep all my dv-videos while editing, and as raw tapes, backups of m

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-22 Thread Joe Little
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:34 PM, RBell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've discovered that Nexanta is not an option: > NexentaStor Developer Edition is time-unlimited and full feature product > that can be deployed with up to one terabyte of user data. > > I plan to use way more than 1TB. (For ins

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-23 Thread RBell
But what are the advantages to Nexanta over for instance * Solaris Express Community Edition * Solaris Express Developer Edition * BeleniX Is it really worth paying a couple of hundreds for when all I need is a NAS? This message posted from opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-23 Thread Patrick Schlaepfer
I choose Nexanta because it's light and slim. Fast installation, and small distribution size. Probably you can also install Solaris Express "headless" without X... Then I like the apt-get package manager, which is very familiar to debian. For what you want to pay a couple of hundreds? > But what a

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-23 Thread RBell
Cant you say the same about opensolaris? Light, slim, fast install, small distribution size ++ Headless is not a must for me. I have to admit that I like apt-get, but it is not a must either. I would not oppose to paying for something which gives me added value, but I can't see all that added v

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-23 Thread Joe Little
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:59 AM, RBell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cant you say the same about opensolaris? Light, slim, fast install, small > distribution size ++ Headless is not a must for me. I have to admit that I > like apt-get, but it is not a must either. > > I would not oppose to paying

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-24 Thread Orvar Korvar
The AOC Micro PCI-X card he uses fits into an ordinary PCI slot. I am using that card together with an ordinary [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1GB RAM. If you use that card with a PCI slot, you will not get the full ~1GB/sec bandwidth as PCI-X does. You will only get the normal PCI bandwidth ~150MB/sec or so