Gavin Maltby wrote:
On 08/25/05 17:34, Felix Schulte wrote:
8 SF15k running *one* OS instance?
I don't think so, I think it is some form of compute cluster.
The Sun Fire-Link had a high bandwidth, super low latency interconnect
and then through Sun Cluster you had the Remote Shared
Gavin Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On 08/25/05 17:19, Felix Schulte wrote:
What is the reason for having the cpuids 512 apart? Just bit mask
shifting?
Well we already had single-core cpus for which the numbering
scheme was established (depending on platform layout) and
there
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
Gavin Maltby wrote:
On 08/25/05 17:34, Felix Schulte wrote:
8 SF15k running *one* OS instance?
I don't think so, I think it is some form of compute cluster.
I bet I know which customer that is.
The Sun Fire-Link had a high bandwidth, super low latency interconnect
JS == Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JS What do you do when somebody make a machine that can hold more than 512
JS CPU chips?
We divide the CPUID space up another way. Someone pointed out that the n and n
+ 512 approach only applies to serengeti and (I think) starcat.
Hi
On 08/25/05 17:19, Felix Schulte wrote:
What is the reason for having the cpuids 512 apart? Just bit mask
shifting?
Well we already had single-core cpus for which the numbering
scheme was established (depending on platform layout) and
there was a need to keep the old cpuid namespace
On 8/25/05, Gavin Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And how is this related to the mythical Sun Fire-Link
product?
Not that mythical - you used to be able to order it and I know
of one site with I think 8 Starcats all linked via this.
The numbering choice likely had something to do with
On 08/25/05 17:34, Felix Schulte wrote:
On 8/25/05, Gavin Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And how is this related to the mythical Sun Fire-Link
product?
Not that mythical - you used to be able to order it and I know
of one site with I think 8 Starcats all linked via this.
The numbering
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 12:37, Gavin Maltby wrote:
On 08/25/05 17:34, Felix Schulte wrote:
On 8/25/05, Gavin Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And how is this related to the mythical Sun Fire-Link
product?
Not that mythical - you used to be able to order it and I know
of one site with I
Thinking twice about NCPU=559 - which Sun product actually supports 558 CPUs?
8 * 72 (SF15k) gives 576, 4*128 (the Fujitsu 128 CPU gear) gives 512 -
no match ;-(
Was this an all-new supercomputer project which got canceled, some
not-yet released interconnect for SF15k or Niagara-on-SF15k?
--
We could tell you but then we'd have to shoot you. :-P
Felix Schulte wrote:
Thinking twice about NCPU=559 - which Sun product actually supports 558 CPUs?
8 * 72 (SF15k) gives 576, 4*128 (the Fujitsu 128 CPU gear) gives 512 -
no match ;-(
Was this an all-new supercomputer project which got
On 8/24/05, Torrey McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could tell you but then we'd have to shoot you. :-P
Is there still something in work or is the related project in
hibernation/canceled?
--
_Felix Schulte
_|_|_ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(0 0)
ooO--(_)--Ooo
--- Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felix Schulte wrote:
On 8/24/05, Torrey McMahon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could tell you but then we'd have to shoot you.
:-P
Is there still something in work or is the related
project in
hibernation/canceled?
Note that the
On 8/24/05, Torrey McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could tell you but then we'd have to shoot you. :-P
What about the Sun FireLink product? Is this hardware to build larger
NUMA machines (2*SF15k with 2*72 CPUs running one Solaris instance) or
something different?
--
_Felix
13 matches
Mail list logo
