--- Peter Tribble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/18/07, Christopher Mahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- Peter Tribble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Pretty well everything you mentioned is there already. What's
> > > missing
> > > is the layer above, where you can put in the smarts
On 5/18/07, Christopher Mahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Peter Tribble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pretty well everything you mentioned is there already. What's
> missing
> is the layer above, where you can put in the smarts like
> user-friendly
> front ends and repositories to download sof
--- Peter Tribble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pretty well everything you mentioned is there already. What's
> missing
> is the layer above, where you can put in the smarts like
> user-friendly
> front ends and repositories to download software from.
Q1: What would such a repository look like?
On 18/05/07, Brian Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am moving this discussion to install-discuss. (Please remove
opensolaris-discuss from any replies).
On 5/17/07, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Gupta wrote:
> > Going back to my initial motivation to get involved with OpenSo
> > On 17/05/07, Brian Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > In order to do that we need a set of common goals,
> > defining what we
> > > expect out of our modern packaging standard. I
> > have started with a
> > > list below. Let's work from there and see if we
> > can't all agree on
> > >
On 17/05/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/05/07, Brian Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > In order to do that we need a set of common goals,
> defining what we
> > expect out of our modern packaging standard. I
>
I am moving this discussion to install-discuss. (Please remove
opensolaris-discuss from any replies).
On 5/17/07, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brian Gupta wrote:
> Going back to my initial motivation to get involved with OpenSolaris,
> and trying to find a common thread from convers
On 5/17/07, Brian Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In order to do that we need a set of common goals, defining what we
expect out of our modern packaging standard. I have started with a
list below. Let's work from there and see if we can't all agree on
what is ideal.
* Must support vertical depe
--- Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/05/07, Brian Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > In order to do that we need a set of common goals,
> defining what we
> > expect out of our modern packaging standard. I
> have started with a
> > list below. Let's work from there and see if w
On 17/05/07, Brian Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In order to do that we need a set of common goals, defining what we
expect out of our modern packaging standard. I have started with a
list below. Let's work from there and see if we can't all agree on
what is ideal.
The funny thing is, the cu
Brian Gupta wrote:
Going back to my initial motivation to get involved with OpenSolaris,
and trying to find a common thread from conversations both within and
without Opensolaris.org, it seems that the biggest area that needs
addressing is the lack of a modern comprehensive packaging and
distribu
Going back to my initial motivation to get involved with OpenSolaris,
and trying to find a common thread from conversations both within and
without Opensolaris.org, it seems that the biggest area that needs
addressing is the lack of a modern comprehensive packaging and
distribution standard for Op
12 matches
Mail list logo
