On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Ken Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:32:18 -0500
>
> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Ken Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:10:24 -0500
> > > "Shawn Walke
A minor nit:
Section 508 applies to software which Federal agencies "develop,
procure, maintain, or use electronic and information technology".
Sun (or any other publicly traded company) is not required by law to
conform to Section 508 unless they desire to provide their
software/services to the
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:32:18 -0500
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Ken Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:10:24 -0500
> > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Ken Gunderson <
Steven Stallion wrote:
> INOW, if you are not working for, or supplying software to the
> government, then you are more than free to completely ignore Section
> 508 and any other accessibility/usability enhancements as you please.
Ignore Section 508 yes, but US companies also have to comply with
t
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Steven Stallion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A minor nit:
>
> Section 508 applies to software which Federal agencies "develop,
> procure, maintain, or use electronic and information technology".
True, but Sun obviously wants to sell to provide software/services t
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Ken Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:10:24 -0500
> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Ken Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:46:38 -0500
> > > "Shawn Walke