You don't seem to have any expertise about linux filesystems, and what
you're writing is both totally offtopic here and completely wrong.
Please let this sub-thread die.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 9/4/05, Ben Rockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn is right, ReiserFS is not the de facto standard for any Linux
distro that I know of, and based on what I'm seeing and hearing it
perhaps never will be. ReiserFS _was_ in a possition to take over the
reigns of power from ext2 when ext3 was
On Sunday 04 September 2005 01:35 pm, Ben Rockwood wrote:
The thread got off topic, the only real point I cared to make was that
if ReiserFS was made avalible for OpenSolaris it would be pretty kool,
reguardless of any opinions on the project of the filesystem itself.
The more the merrier.
It
On Saturday 03 September 2005 06:55 pm, Felix Schulte wrote:
On 9/4/05, James Dickens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
some day i will remember to click reply all not just reply :-)
Blame the list admin. The lists here are configured the wrong way.
Mailman defaults to the option to reply to the
On Sunday 04 September 2005 01:26 am, Ben Rockwood wrote:
But, back to the origonal post... of all the filesystems on Linux I
think ReiserFS would be on the bottom of my list. ext2/3 is what people
need. XFS/JFS would be damned nice.
I don't know actual usage, but ReiserFS is certainly being
On 9/4/05, Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't seem to have any expertise about linux filesystems, and what
you're writing is both totally offtopic here and completely wrong.
Which of my comments here contain wrong information? Which one?
--
_Felix Schulte
On 9/5/05, Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:35:54PM -0700, Ben Rockwood wrote:
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
You don't seem to have any expertise about linux filesystems, and what
you're writing is both totally offtopic here and completely wrong.
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thread got off topic, the only real point I cared to make was that
if ReiserFS was made avalible for OpenSolaris it would be pretty kool,
reguardless of any opinions on the project of the filesystem itself.
The more the merrier.
Of
Kool. Thanks Christoph. :)
benr.
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:35:54PM -0700, Ben Rockwood wrote:
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
You don't seem to have any expertise about linux filesystems, and what
you're writing is both totally offtopic here and completely wrong.
Has anyone at Sun yet thought about porting ReiserFS to OpenSolaris?
Not for booting but having a way to share partitions on dual-boot
systems, USB sticks or mobile disks.
--
_Felix Schulte
_|_|_ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(0 0)
ooO--(_)--Ooo
some day i will remember to click reply all not just reply :-)
On 9/3/05, James Dickens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/3/05, Felix Schulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone at Sun yet thought about porting ReiserFS to OpenSolaris?
Not for booting but having a way to share partitions on
On 9/4/05, James Dickens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/3/05, Felix Schulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone at Sun yet thought about porting ReiserFS to OpenSolaris?
Not for booting but having a way to share partitions on dual-boot
systems, USB sticks or mobile disks.
--
i would be
On 9/3/05, Felix Schulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both xfs and jfs are - like ufs - at the end of their development
line, ReiserFS isn't. And ReiserFS is becoming more and more the de
facto standard on Linux.
I can't even fathom how you define ReiserFS becoming de facto in the
Linux world. As
13 matches
Mail list logo
