Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
I am royally confused and not sure if seconds matter anymore, but
here's one just in case:
+1
There are people willing to invest their time/resources on an
OpenSolaris project. Please do and thank you. We desperately need to
improve on the walker-to-talkers ratio.
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 08:28:19AM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
> How does this distribution relate to the other distributions that exist?
>
> How does it differ from the Solaris Express releases? In time, how will
> it differ from upcoming Solaris releases?
>
> What characteristics differentiate
On 5/30/07, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1.2 Description
This project proposes to create an OpenSolaris binary distribution
with a long term goal of increasing the userbase and growing
mindshare in the volume market by providing easy access to the
technology created wi
I am royally confused and not sure if seconds matter anymore, but here's one
just in case:
+1
There are people willing to invest their time/resources on an OpenSolaris
project. Please do and thank you. We desperately need to improve on the
walker-to-talkers ratio. (Wouldn't that be great if
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Ian Murdock wrote:
> The slower moving release will be called "Solaris". :-)
As long as it isn't called "Slowaris"! :-)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OGB member
CEO,
My Online Home Inventory
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URLs: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
http://w
Hello,
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:38:03PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> I somewhat disagree, and I think the frustration you have is partly due to the
> technical limitations of the upgrade process that you've experienced. While I
> respect your opinion for wanting a slower moving release, others w
On 5/30/07, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Francois Saint-Jacques wrote:
> 1. 6 month is WAY too short in my opinion. There is nothing more painfull
> than upgrading Fedora core 1 to 6 or Ubuntu abc to xyz while dist-upgrading
3-4
> releases. Update process *should not* take more than 3
Hey,
Francois Saint-Jacques wrote:
> 1. 6 month is WAY too short in my opinion. There is nothing more painfull
> than upgrading Fedora core 1 to 6 or Ubuntu abc to xyz while dist-upgrading
> 3-4
> releases. Update process *should not* take more than 3 hours. I understand
> this is may be impossib
1.4 Involvement
There is a strong intention for this to be a community grass roots
project, with open contribution. We hope for this project to be
consensus driven, though ultimately the project leads will need
to dictate direction if that proves unfeasible for delivering
a ti
Hello Glynn, Ian and others,
I am not active on this list, but I started following your thread this
weekend because I'm really intrigued by the Indiana project. My first
experience with OpenSolaris was on Nexenta, which is a quite nice
distribution.
Since Indiana is aimed at attracting the Linux
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:44:13PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
> > It also would seem to directly counteract any desire to be a binary
> > distribution named "OpenSolaris" given it would be under the sole
> > control of somebody other than OpenSolaris.
>
> I agree with you in principle..however..
Richard Lowe wrote:
> Brian Gupta wrote:
>>> 1.4 Involvement
>>>
>>> There is a strong intention for this to be a community grass roots
>>> project, with open contribution. We hope for this project to be
>>> consensus driven, though ultimately the project leads will need
>>> to di
Brian Gupta wrote:
1.4 Involvement
There is a strong intention for this to be a community grass roots
project, with open contribution. We hope for this project to be
consensus driven, though ultimately the project leads will need
to dictate direction if that proves unfeasible for
Hey,
Here's the project proposal that should have been out a long while back
(apologies, I'm happy to take the blame on this one). Before anyone gets too
caught up in how little the proposal actually covers, I intend to follow up with
my thoughts if and when the project alias gets created - I'd li
14 matches
Mail list logo