> On 6/4/07, Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Eric Boutilier wrote:
> >
> > >> Given how negative this community is on Linux...
> > >
> > > But when one looks literally *anywhere* else on
> opensolaris.org besides
> > > this
> > > list one finds the complete opposite, namely,
> flexib
On 01/06/07, MC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm interested in doing what needs to be done to move
> forwards and without
> losing those users that run Solaris 8 and 9 and 10.
> That is a bit of a
> challenge to say the least.
If Project Indiana had no Solaris 8-10 users and 5% of Linux users,
> > I'm interested in doing what needs to be done to
> move
> > forwards and without
> > losing those users that run Solaris 8 and 9 and
> 10.
> > That is a bit of a
> > challenge to say the least.
>
> If Project Indiana had no Solaris 8-10 users and 5%
> of Linux users, it would still be a succe
> I'm interested in doing what needs to be done to move
> forwards and without
> losing those users that run Solaris 8 and 9 and 10.
> That is a bit of a
> challenge to say the least.
If Project Indiana had no Solaris 8-10 users and 5% of Linux users, it would
still be a success. Meanwhile Sola
