> *Sigh* I feel all dirty now; I gotta take a bath! :-)
Hah hah :)
Martin
p.s.: I got a Tadpole 500SX myself.
And I'm _sure_ I earn/have less than you.
Just a question of priority.
And - I admit it - also paaatience.
( Especially when compiling ON on a 500MHz US_IIe ... )
Hardcore!
> --
>
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> p.s.: I got a Tadpole 500SX myself.
Cool.
> And I'm _sure_ I earn/have less than you.
I've been out of work (except for a 7 month contracting stint that ended
last September) for about 4 years now, so I earn $0 over any meaningful
time period*, and I
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> What ?
> Rich Teer has moved to a PeeCeee.
Yeah, sickening, isn't it? :-)
> Isn't that the same guy who once called his U60's a set of "real computers"?!
> Just back in early 2005 or late 2004, if not later?
Oh, my Ultra 60, E220R, and Sun Blade 100
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Bill Bradford wrote:
>
> > Total build time was approximately 2:45 (1.28Ghz
> UltraSPARC-IIIi, 2G
> > RAM, Hitachi Travelstar 5K80 40G IDE HD with UFS
> logging turned on).
> > This compares to 4:05 on my dual 450Mhz U60 with 2G
> RAM and 36G SCSI.
>
> Blimey! The same bui
Hello Bill and Rich,
I think it is not quite correct to compare sparc build with x64 build, but
anyway,
could you please add more information:
1. number of CPUs
2. number of parallel jobs (assuming you use dmake)
3. total real time
4. total user time
5. total sys time
Thanks in advance,
Nikolay
