Eric Lowe wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> ...
> >>> delay the project proposal until it is clear that Sun actually
> >>> releases the patches for their work. Starting from scratch without
> >>> help from Sun will be much harder.
> >> Just a quick note to say I haven't dropped this on the floor. Plea
Hi,
Roland Mainz wrote:
serious cycles on this though we'd like to, and the folks who were in
involved in 64K simply don't have any interest in working on this in the open.
Why ? What do they fear ? Being swamped&overburned with too many emails
or what ?
This is a community -- it's up to the
>The filesystems appear to be prepared to handle multiple pages per block
>but not multiple blocks per page.
Hence no 4K blocksize on UltraSPARC.
(But even 4K pages with 8K blocks didn't work right on x86, at least)
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mai
>
>>The filesystems appear to be prepared to handle multiple pages per block
>>but not multiple blocks per page.
>
> Hence no 4K blocksize on UltraSPARC.
>
> (But even 4K pages with 8K blocks didn't work right on x86, at least)
>
maybe it is time to update the newfs manpage. For Solaris 10 at le
>
>>
>>>The filesystems appear to be prepared to handle multiple pages per block
>>>but not multiple blocks per page.
>>
>> Hence no 4K blocksize on UltraSPARC.
>>
>> (But even 4K pages with 8K blocks didn't work right on x86, at least)
>>
>
>maybe it is time to update the newfs manpage. For Sola
The filesystems appear to be prepared to handle multiple pages per block
but not multiple blocks per page.
>>>
>>> Hence no 4K blocksize on UltraSPARC.
>>>
>>> (But even 4K pages with 8K blocks didn't work right on x86, at least)
>>>
>>
>>maybe it is time to update the newfs manpage. For
Dennis Clarke schrieb:
In what sense? It already says "the sun4u architecture doesn't
support the 4K blocksize".
It simply seems odd to refer to the 4K page size for the non-sun4u hardware
when Solaris 10 does not support sun4m or sun4d etc etc. Simply leave the
manpage with an 8K page size
On 4/1/06, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > because it implicitly assumes that their
> > approach was the best approach to solving the problem or was even tractable.
>
> Ok... I'll try to sync with Holger berger then how to proceed...
Feel free to write the project proposal. I will seco
