On Sat, 26 May 2007, Doug Scott wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Because Sun wants Solaris to be a success" is the short answer to your
question.
You can't make money on a product when you're spiting the world and
fighting losing battles. That
's anti-user. That's bad business.
Not an
On 26/05/07, Doug Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> "Because Sun wants Solaris to be a success" is the short answer to your
question.
>>
>> You can't make money on a product when you're spiting the world and fighting
losing battles. That
>>
> 's anti-user. That's ba
>You are probably assuming that your customers only use Solaris! Being
>one of your customers, stupid thing's like the backspace key not
>exhibiting the same results as every other device that we own is very
>annoying. You might find that your customer might celebrate rather than
>be annoyed i
On 5/25/07, Anne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The sad thing about this is that I still cannot get the backspace working on
the Java environment. UGH what a major pain. And the DEL key acts the same
way. The ONLY thing that works for backspace is continually hitting "CTRL+H"
The Java interface is s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Because Sun wants Solaris to be a success" is the short answer to your
question.
You can't make money on a product when you're spiting the world and fighting
losing battles. T
hat
's anti-user. That's bad bu
ris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: RE: backspace key not working on Java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Not annoying current Solaris customers is one part of that strategy;
> it is all too often ignored by people suggesting random changes to the
> system's defaults.
That coul
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> "Because Sun wants Solaris to be a success" is the short answer to your
>>> question.
>>>
>>> You can't make money on a product when you're spiting the world and
>>> fighting losing battles. T
hat
>>>
>> 's anti-user. That's bad business.
>>
>>
>>
>> Not a
I have a nagging fear that some people inside Sun read this mailing list
and interpret it as 'The voice of the customer'. It's not, it's the
opinion of a self-selected group.
+1
Totally correct. OpenSolaris.org, is definitely not the place to find
your average Sun customer opinions.
-Brian
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Because Sun wants Solaris to be a success" is the short answer to your
question.
You can't make money on a product when you're spiting the world and fighting
losing battles. That
's anti-user. That's bad business.
Not annoying current Solaris customers i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not annoying current Solaris customers is one part of that strategy;
it is all too often ignored by people suggesting random changes
to the system's defaults.
That could be said about a significant number of the conversations on
this list - 10 people bitching about so
>"Because Sun wants Solaris to be a success" is the short answer to your
>question.
>
>You can't make money on a product when you're spiting the world and fighting
>losing battles. That
's anti-user. That's bad business.
>
Not annoying current Solaris customers is one part of that strategy;
> >This should be filed as an RFE. Casper?
>
> Why? Delete is the proper key to use for doing a step
> back; this
> ain't PC land where they confused DEL (destructive)
> and Backspace
> (non destructive) with Backspace (delete left) and
> DEL (delete under).
> I *never* want to delete what is to t
> Looks like you did not understand the problem.
>
> DEL is the correct way to go.
I understood what Casper wrote.
Technically, Casper is right.
Ergonomically, realistically, it's unreasonable.
> The problem is that the PC keyboards are not
> ergonomic and have
> the BACKSPACE key where DEL be
13 matches
Mail list logo
