Martin Bochnig wrote:
>all,
>
>
>did I already find the solution ??
>Did/does it exist for years?
>
>http://developers.sun.com/prodtech/cc/documentation/ss11/mr/READMEs/c++.html
>
>""If you want to use the shared-library version of libCstd and/or
>libiostream you have two options:
>
> 1. Distrib
Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> On Sep 9, 2006, at 14:15, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
SUNW breaks the law, because they themselves offer the Distro-JDK for
download and are therefore themselves "Distro-JDK distributors":
>>>
>>> No, Sun is not bound by its o
Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> On Sep 9, 2006, at 14:15, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
SUNW breaks the law, because they themselves offer the Distro-JDK for
download and are therefore themselves "Distro-JDK distributors":
>>>
>>> No, Sun is not bound by its o
On Sep 9, 2006, at 14:15, Martin Bochnig wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SUNW breaks the law, because they themselves offer the Distro-JDK
for
download and are therefore themselves "Distro-JDK distributors":
No, Sun is not bound by its own redistribution licenses so it does
not
break
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>>SUNW breaks the law, because they themselves offer the Distro-JDK for
>>>download and are therefore themselves "Distro-JDK distributors":
>>>
>>>
>>
>>No, Sun is not bound by its own redistribution licenses so it does not
>>break the law. It owns the JDK so it c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>SUNW breaks the law, because they themselves offer the Distro-JDK for
>>download and are therefore themselves "Distro-JDK distributors":
>>
>>
>
>No, Sun is not bound by its own redistribution licenses so it does not
>break the law. It owns the JDK so it can distrib
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Moinak has well summarized a few points, that I did not express so good
>>(because I took them for g
>>
>>
>ranted, for example: That only C++ code is affected, and only when compiled
>with SUNWspro).
>
>
>>His summary is a useful addition to this thread.
>>
>SUNW breaks the law, because they themselves offer the Distro-JDK for
>download and are therefore themselves "Distro-JDK distributors":
No, Sun is not bound by its own redistribution licenses so it does not
break the law. It owns the JDK so it can distributes it as it sees
fit.
Casper
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>Moinak Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> No, I did not mean that. The question was "How could communtiy
>>OpenSolaris distros
>> function without needed system libraries being present ?". So I
>>pointed out that libCrun
>> is not a system library, but a co
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Joerg
Schilling wrote:
Moinak Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
No, I did not mean that. The question
was "How could communtiy OpenSolaris distros
function without needed system libraries being present ?". So I
pointed out that libCrun
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Moinak Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, I did not mean that. The question was "How could communtiy
OpenSolaris distros
function without needed system libraries being present ?". So I
pointed out that libCrun
is not a system library, but a compiler specifi
Moinak Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>No, I did not mean that. The question was "How could communtiy
> OpenSolaris distros
>function without needed system libraries being present ?". So I
> pointed out that libCrun
>is not a system library, but a compiler specific runtime which is
>Moinak has well summarized a few points, that I did not express so good
>(because I took them for g
ranted, for example: That only C++ code is affected, and only when compiled
with SUNWspro).
>His summary is a useful addition to this thread.
It is somewhat strange that the "runtime.libraries"
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Bob Palowoda wrote:
Gueven Bay wrote:
You know Mr Casper,
My question is still not answered, yet.
Even if the mentioned libraries are Visual Basic
libs, this does not matter.
But what matter is the qeustion: How and what
Bob Palowoda wrote:
[...]
All the necessary system libraries are open. The
libraries like
ibCrun, libCstd, libdemangle etc. are
libraries specific to the C++ runtime environment
for binaries
ompiled using SUN Studio compiler.
These libraries are bundled by default in Solaris
Express, but a
Bob Palowoda wrote:
>>Gueven Bay wrote:
>>
>>
>>>You know Mr Casper,
>>>
>>>My question is still not answered, yet.
>>>
>>>Even if the mentioned libraries are Visual Basic
>>>
>>>
>>libs, this does not matter.
>>
>>
>>>But what matter is the qeustion: How and what
>>>
>>>
>>exa
> Gueven Bay wrote:
> > You know Mr Casper,
> >
> > My question is still not answered, yet.
> >
> > Even if the mentioned libraries are Visual Basic
> libs, this does not matter.
> > But what matter is the qeustion: How and what
> exactly the existing distributions are distributing
> -aka giving aw
Thank you bochnig for the elaborate answer.
It is now clearer to me.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
18 matches
Mail list logo
