[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-07 Thread UNIX admin
Hmmm... I like the sound of that... Please don't misunderstand me -- this was in context of Linux. If one really wants to start raking in some serious cash, the big bucks are with Solaris. As soon as one moves into mid- and big-size companies, Solaris is bread and butter there. This

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread Hari Sundararajan
Very nice .. vibrant community? Oh boy! I have never had 32 posts in a discussion regarding a I'm new here, trying to understand .. topic.. In any case, I read a post about how the OS are merely nv_b50, nv_b51 and so on.. that clears up stuff even more.. just newer builds. Besides, I am

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread UNIX admin
No no no no no no no no. and once more for good measure: no. If you maintain this sort of mentality, then OpenSolaris will never be a separate entity. This is exactly the sort of thought we need to get away from. Why? The source code is free to the public. Should Sun go buh-bye

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread UNIX admin
Don't make it more complicated than it already is, There we go. This would be one of those I told you so moments. It's complicated. Way overcomplicated. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread UNIX admin
But there *is* a distinction. Solaris != OpenSolaris, and vice versa. OK Rich, if Sun's Solaris is based on OpenSolaris, meaning it is Sun's distribution of OpenSolaris, what is the distinction? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread UNIX admin
If you maintain this sort of mentality, then OpenSolaris will never be a separate entity. This is exactly the sort of thought we need to get away from. BTW Steve, as a person to person, this little snippet really got to me. For 15 years I've lived on Sun and Solaris, ate, breathed,

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread James Carlson
UNIX admin writes: But there *is* a distinction. Solaris != OpenSolaris, and vice versa. OK Rich, if Sun's Solaris is based on OpenSolaris, meaning it is Sun's distribution of OpenSolaris, what is the distinction? There are things available in Open Solaris that are not yet in any

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread Dennis Clarke
UNIX admin writes: Now all of a sudden associating Solaris -- most notably OpenSolaris -- is not what we want, now it's bad, in the way, out of favor, not in fashion, Untrue. Solaris is still cool. It's just that Open Solaris is *NOT* the same thing as Sun's Solaris, and quite

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread Rich Teer
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, UNIX admin wrote: OK Rich, if Sun's Solaris is based on OpenSolaris, meaning it is Sun's distribution of OpenSolaris, what is the distinction? Very simply, Sun takes what is in OpenSolaris, removes some stuff and adds some other stuff. The result is the Solaris we all

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread John Plocher
UNIX admin wrote: But there *is* a distinction. Solaris != OpenSolaris, and vice versa. if Sun's Solaris is based on OpenSolaris, meaning it is Sun's distribution of OpenSolaris, what is the distinction? Ignoring the fact that OpenSolaris is not a distro, and Solaris is, a version of

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread Stephen Lau
UNIX admin wrote: Sun Solaris is Sun's distribution of OpenSolaris. Period. OK, so where's the difference? Sun Solaris is Sun's distribution of OpenSolaris. OK. So if B is based on A, but not quite A, however most of it is made out of A, you could argue that B is not A, but however is A for

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread Stephen Lau
UNIX admin wrote: If you maintain this sort of mentality, then OpenSolaris will never be a separate entity. This is exactly the sort of thought we need to get away from. BTW Steve, as a person to person, this little snippet really got to me. For 15 years I've lived on Sun and Solaris, ate,

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread Stephen Lau
UNIX admin wrote: Try using Sun Solaris to make this more obvious. As far as I am concerned, current Solaris is another distribution of OpenSolaris, most notably Sun's dsitribution of it. However it looks like we're trying to put as much distance between Sun's OpenSolaris distro and

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread Christine Sterner
Hi, I don't play in OpenSolaris. I'm not a developer any more. I work for Sun and I love Solaris and have lived and breathed and eaten and dreamt it for almost 16 years. I cannot tell you how much I and all of Sun appreciate your efforts and blood in the trenches. You are our bretheren.

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: New to OpenSolaris, need help?

2006-12-06 Thread Ignacio Marambio Catán
On 12/6/06, Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: UNIX admin wrote: Try using Sun Solaris to make this more obvious. As far as I am concerned, current Solaris is another distribution of OpenSolaris, most notably Sun's dsitribution of it. This has become one of the most useless threads i've