Haim Zilberbord wrote:
one more thing
SXCR is free
i don't want become beta-tester for nevada express.
Ummm then the reason for wanting to play with open solaris is what?
Nevada is simply Sun's distro of Open Solaris.
i don't feel safe when i can't build any tool form source
I
Sun linker and this way create a 100% correct set of makefiles
that also include auto-dependencies against libraries that have been linked
to a program.
It means that opensolaris can be built only with this make ?
Is there any source code for Sun make ?
Any specs that can help add required
If sun dmake(1) is provided only with sun studio, then whole build process
depends on Sun's wish to distribute Studio tools.
THey're excellent tools and they are free.
And no, OpenSolaris does not depend on Sun's make; the makefiles
are just a side-show to the actual product and they can
If people want to have a knife fight in front of thousands of people
on list, I'm going to pull up a chair and watch the show.
you want to say that i am flamer ? i am not interested in flame.
i'm just asking concrete questions that definitely have answer, and it takes
lots of messages before i
Haim Zilberbord writes:
If people want to have a knife fight in front of thousands of people
on list, I'm going to pull up a chair and watch the show.
you want to say that i am flamer ? i am not interested in flame.
It really does look like flame-bait to many of us. Questions about
Haim Zilberbord writes:
By integrating a new feature like this, we'd be forcing everyone
working on Open Solaris to test under Linux.
it is why i don't even think about integration of this modifications to ON
all i want, is to invastigate passibility, and if it possibe - do it once.
It
building the barest minimum of OpenSolaris...
totally agree
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
You want to participate in the OpenSolaris initiative, and yet, you do
not want your work to benefit Sun (who is supporting this project with ...
i want contribute to ON consolidation, other consolidations is not interesting
to me. contributing to opensolaris (as i understand) != using SX.
if
Haim Zilberbord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solaris is POSIX compliant. Linux is not. If you question is: 'what
tools are not strictly POSIX compliant?' I would rethink that question -
POSIX is a minimal specification and does not provide for every possible
extension a covered API or utility
Haim Zilberbord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sun linker and this way create a 100% correct set of makefiles
that also include auto-dependencies against libraries that have been linked
to a program.
It means that opensolaris can be built only with this make ?
Unless you like to totally rewrite ~
i want build distribution from scratch without any Corporate Solaris
еncumbrance. i know that it will break compatibility, but it is good thing for
people with debian background (yes , i know about nexenta) i think “Damn Small
Opensolaris” with working X.org ,packaging system like prgsrc or
one more thing
SXCR is free
i don't want become beta-tester for nevada express.
i don't feel safe when i can't build any tool form source
questions :
why there is such thing like “minimum ON build version” ?
GNU make has lots of extensions...
can i download and build required extensions
Haim,
If you are seeking help on building ON in a Linux sandbox, I can think
of a number of ways you could have approached this without putting the
backs up of virtually every user on this mailing list. Solaris is not
and never will be Linux. This is not to say Linux is inferior - just
that
13 matches
Mail list logo
