john kroll writes:
Just one question not even sure who to reference it to; all of you guys are
way out of my league. Once sx:ce becomes solaris11 : the bleeding edge of Sun
will be solely opensolaris right??
There's certainly no guarantee that our marketing will launch a
product called
Just one question not even sure who to reference it to; all of you guys are way
out of my league. Once sx:ce becomes solaris11 : the bleeding edge of Sun will
be solely opensolaris right??
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
You may want to be aware of the fact that sudo is
being integrated.
PSARC/2008/370 sudo was closed-approved on June 18th,
2008.
You may now stop unfairly accusing sun of NIH
syndrome.
Thank you for the permission, but I will stop accusing Sun of the NIH
sindrome when they stop
UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You may want to be aware of the fact that sudo is being integrated.
PSARC/2008/370 sudo was closed-approved on June 18th, 2008.
You may now stop unfairly accusing sun of NIH syndrome.
Thank you for the permission, but I will stop accusing Sun of the NIH
2008/7/2 UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You may want to be aware of the fact that sudo is
being integrated.
PSARC/2008/370 sudo was closed-approved on June 18th,
2008.
You may now stop unfairly accusing sun of NIH
syndrome.
Thank you for the permission, but I will stop accusing Sun of the
UNIX admin wrote:
Thank you for the permission, but I will stop accusing Sun of the NIH
sindrome when they stop reinventing the wheel. To be concrete, in this
particular case, that will be when Sun drops RBAC and pfexec in favor of
sudo, which is almost guaranteed to never happen.
So to
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 07:32 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
So to make you happiest here Sun should kill Solaris and switch to Linux?
I think you've missed a lot of his earlier posts. He'd be happiest if
Sun killed Solaris and switched to *IRIX*.
___
Your implication that this would leave equivalent
functionality is not
based in fact.
OK then, what makes RBAC roles different from sudo roles, conceptually? I'd
love to know.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your implication that this would leave equivalent functionality is
not based in fact.
OK then, what makes RBAC roles different from sudo roles,
conceptually? I'd love to know.
Well, I was talking about functionality, not conceptual equivalence. And
I
I can also understand
the lack of enthusiasm for Indiana (even though it
was my first contact with Solaris and still is) since
Solaris seems to loose it's own identity in favor of
becoming more like Ubuntu.
...
There
already is a channel for Project Indiana (#os200805)
where mostly
Ok my response:
There
already is a channel for Project Indiana
(#os200805)
What an interesting observation!
Is it really surprising a channel that has not been advertised has nobody on
it? That is why new people come to #opensolaris:
quasi: flood the channel with annoying noobs till the
SX-DE is pretty much out of the question after July.
That clearly has not endeared Sun to the old school.
They tried to take SX:DE in the direction of GNU/Linux.
That's not what is needed. What is needed is a future Solaris 11, loaded with
compilers and made better by including a full stack
UNIX admin wrote:
The question is, how will the newcomers make progress? Will they eventually
have to take the plunge and go SX:DE or SX:CE?
Not unless they want to go backwards to old builds - there are no more
SXDE builds, and SXCE builds won't keep coming forever.
And the really
I would like to see the machine offer its own advice linking forum requests to
answered working like outcomes. This would give newbies something immediate to
try or guide them to info or inform them what to do or report without someone
else having to answer a stupid question. I'd even consider
One of the things I notice on the #opensolaris IRC is a lack of enthusiasm for
Indiana and also a lack of enthusiasm for assisting people with Indiana
enquiries. A lot of people who are on the channel use Solaris Express Community
Edition.
I believe that the way to go would be to have a
I want to be clear here that not everybody on the #opensolaris channel is
hostile.
I have had some excellent assistance on the channel particularly in regard to a
wireless driver.
But the hostility to Indiana users does make one start to think that FreeBSD
might be a friendlier alternative.
One of the things I notice on the #opensolaris IRC is
yeah opensolaris has a lot of hands and none of them know what all of the
others are doing :)
I believe that the way to go would be to have a separate #opensolaris-help
channel
signed, endorsed, +1 voted
This message posted from
I can understand that a lot of people are upset about the way Sun acts by
redirecting new people to #opensolaris. But I don't really understand how
people can react hostile towards Indiana users (never really saw that by the
way). I can also understand the lack of enthusiasm for Indiana (even
The #os200805 looks like a potentially good idea. But it is not well advertise
or even shown on the
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/chat/
I don't want to be going on #opensolaris and annoying the old school users.
They have a point.
The #os200805 channel might be alright except you have to
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Paul Harper wrote:
I don't want to be going on #opensolaris and annoying the old school
users. They have a point.
The #os200805 channel might be alright except you have to rename it
every six months. That is why I believe #opensolaris-help or
#opensolaris-newuser is
20 matches
Mail list logo
