Eric Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steven Sim wrote:
> > Hello all;
> >
> > I have always wondered why Sun's default value for maxphys is only
> > 128Kbyte.
> ...
>
> The fact that we still have kernel tunables for things like this makes me
> want to check myself into the looney bin.
>
> We
Steven Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have always wondered why Sun's default value for maxphys is only 128Kbyte.
>
> In these days of EMC and other fibre related storages, it seemingly does
> not make sense.
>
> This above is especially so when sd_max_xfer_size is set to 1 Mbyte by
> default
Steven Sim wrote:
> I have always wondered why Sun's default value for maxphys is only 128Kbyte.
>
> In these days of EMC and other fibre related storages, it seemingly does
> not make sense.
>
> This above is especially so when sd_max_xfer_size is set to 1 Mbyte by
> default.
>
> Shouldn't the
Steven Sim wrote:
Hello all;
I have always wondered why Sun's default value for maxphys is only
128Kbyte.
...
The fact that we still have kernel tunables for things like this makes me
want to check myself into the looney bin.
We could up them now, but how do we know the values are optimal
Hello all;
I have always wondered why Sun's default value for maxphys is only 128Kbyte.
In these days of EMC and other fibre related storages, it seemingly does
not make sense.
This above is especially so when sd_max_xfer_size is set to 1 Mbyte by
default.
Shouldn't the above values all be
