You are correct for perl and tcsh but for the rest you are mistaken.
Even though, Sun did plan to use the OSS version of sendmail in 1992, this did
not happen before OpenSolaris was released.
Long before; I'm sure John Beck can tell you exactly when we started to
use a more modern sendmail.
casper@sun.com wrote:
You are correct for perl and tcsh but for the rest you are mistaken.
Even though, Sun did plan to use the OSS version of sendmail in 1992, this
did
not happen before OpenSolaris was released.
Long before; I'm sure John Beck can tell you exactly when we started
Maybe the new pkg system will slowly take over from blastwave and maybe it
won't, but as long as blastwave is the only source for software like DVD
players it will still be needed.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
i dont think that you need the whole bunch of blastwave to be able to
play a DVD..
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Charles Hedrick hedr...@rutgers.edu wrote:
Maybe the new pkg system will slowly take over from blastwave and maybe it
won't, but as long as blastwave is the only source for
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Hi, I believe he means, that the dependency resolution algorithm used
by csw (in the past with pkg-get, and also now) is suboptimal (which
is not a shame, as most others are, too).
For example,
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
blastwave's packages are built with the assumption that libaries live
relative to the rest of the programs (such as under /opt/csw), are compiled
with different flags, and generally assume
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
My point was that a dependency algorithm was not the cause of the issue
with the blastwave packages. It is primarily an issue of how they are
built.
There is no issue with Blastwave packages. These packages just make use from
the binary
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
My point was that a dependency algorithm was not the cause of the issue
with the blastwave packages. It is primarily an issue of how they are
built.
There is no issue with Blastwave packages. These packages just make use
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
My point was that a dependency algorithm was not the cause of the issue
with the blastwave packages. It is primarily an issue of how they are
built.
There is no issue
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
That's not the problem.
The problem is, that 5.9, 5.10, 5.10.1 and 5.11 are only symlinks to
5.8 most of the time, inside the csw repo.
For simplicity it would have been sufficient to concentrate only on 2
build targets,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
My point was that a dependency algorithm was not the cause of the issue
with the
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
For any of the dependencies, it should be obvious that the dependencies that
are valid for Solaris 8 need to be installed for Solaris 11 too as any
blastwave package need to use the other probrams from it's own
Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
In 2005 I got banned from the csw mailing lists (because I didn't like
Dennis' ***intransparent*** ***business model*** , where all work
I have no idea why you don't like Dennis
...
And: During times of non-dictatorship COMMUNITY effort,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
For any of the dependencies, it should be obvious that the dependencies
that
are valid for Solaris 8 need to be installed for
I have reasons.
What I didn't like were a few questions of how things were handled.
Nevertheless, I do respect him.
It is a thing of the past, it is ok.
%martin
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
But please note that at the time Solaris 8 was created, Sun was just in a
state
where the managers believed in closed source. With Solaris 8, there are only
thre OSS packages:
- mkisofs
- gzip
- bash
Even Solaris 8 had a lot more than just 3 open
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
But please note that at the time Solaris 8 was created, Sun was just in a
state
where the managers believed in closed source. With Solaris 8, there are only
thre OSS packages:
-
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
But please note that at the time Solaris 8 was created, Sun was just in a
state
where the managers believed in closed source. With Solaris 8, there are
only
thre OSS packages:
- mkisofs
- gzip
-
I followed below link to set up my SXCE 112_snv x86 so that I can install apps
from blastwave.org.
http://www.blastwave.org/howto.html
However, forexample if I install nmap (or any other package),
I noticed that pkgutil intend to install other dependencies that they already
installed in my
it's normal.
blastwave duplicates many things
FYI: nmap *is* in SXCE
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:37 PM, vuthecuong coitrancuoidy...@gmail.com wrote:
I followed below link to set up my SXCE 112_snv x86 so that I can install
apps from blastwave.org.
http://www.blastwave.org/howto.html
However,
vuthecuong coitrancuoidy...@gmail.com wrote:
I followed below link to set up my SXCE 112_snv x86 so that I can install
apps from blastwave.org.
http://www.blastwave.org/howto.html
However, forexample if I install nmap (or any other package),
I noticed that pkgutil intend to install other
Andras Barna andras.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
it's normal.
blastwave duplicates many things
Blastwave does not duplicate things but does what it needs to do.
If Solaris did inlcude more OSS with Solaris 8, things would look different.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home)
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Andras Barna andras.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
it's normal.
blastwave duplicates many things
Blastwave does not duplicate things but does what it needs to do.
If Solaris did inlcude more OSS with
vuthecuong wrote:
I noticed that pkgutil intend to install other dependencies that they already
installed in my machine:
===
bash-3.2# /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil --install nmap
Checking catalog integrity with gpg.
gpg: 2009年05月01日 10時56分49秒 ICTにDSA鍵ID A1999E90で施された署名
gpg:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Oscar del Rio del...@mie.utoronto.ca wrote:
vuthecuong wrote:
I noticed that pkgutil intend to install other dependencies that they
already installed in my machine:
===
bash-3.2# /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil --install nmap
Checking catalog
Joerg Schilling wrote:
For any of the dependencies, it should be obvious that the dependencies that
are valid for Solaris 8 need to be installed for Solaris 11 too as any
blastwave package need to use the other probrams from it's own environment in
order to behave reliably.
It can also
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Hi, I believe he means, that the dependency resolution algorithm used
by csw (in the past with pkg-get, and also now) is suboptimal (which
is not a shame, as most others are, too).
For example, speaking in directed graph language (#0), Blastwave
doesn't ensure that cycles
27 matches
Mail list logo
