Re: [osol-discuss] statvfs/df weirdness for tmpfs

2006-07-21 Thread Thomas Maier-Komor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> swap 149192401104 14918136 1%/etc/svc/vol= >> atile >> swap 15365960 447832 14918128 3%/tmp >> swap 14918208 80 14918128 1%/var/run >> >> What we are seeing here is that df reports diffe

Re: [osol-discuss] statvfs/df weirdness for tmpfs

2006-07-21 Thread Casper . Dik
>Somehow you are right. But "blocks in use" accounts against "swap", and >swap is used by all those mount points. Except that it isn't really "swap" but "available virtual memory". >Finally, what is most important to me, the first number (i.e. swap >total) looks broken to me, as a result of the

Re: [osol-discuss] statvfs/df weirdness for tmpfs

2006-07-21 Thread Casper . Dik
>swap 149192401104 14918136 1%/etc/svc/vol= >atile >swap 15365960 447832 14918128 3%/tmp >swap 14918208 80 14918128 1%/var/run > >What we are seeing here is that df reports different sizes for swap, = >which actuall

[osol-discuss] statvfs/df weirdness for tmpfs

2006-07-21 Thread Thomas Maier-Komor
Hi everybody, maybe somebody can explain me this behavior: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ df -F tmpfs -h Dateisystem Größe belegt verfügbar Kapazität Eingehängt auf swap14G 1,1M14G 1%/etc/svc/volatile swap15G 437M14G 3%/tmp swap