Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both the original SPARC 64 bit port and the amd64 bit port
were started with gcc. Solaris 10's x64 binaries are
I thought that in 1996, there was no 64 bit sparc support in GCC.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both the original SPARC 64 bit port and the amd64 bit port
were started with gcc. Solaris 10's x64 binaries are
I thought that in 1996, there was no 64 bit sparc support in GCC.
maybe not in the publically available GCC but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps engineering resources that went into making OpenSolaris
GCC-friendly would have been better spent porting SS10 to other
platforms? Were I the manager that had the power to decide, I would
have certainly pushed in that direction, not the other way around.
The
Darren J Moffat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps engineering resources that went into making OpenSolaris
GCC-friendly would have been better spent porting SS10 to other
platforms? Were I the manager that had the power to decide, I would
have certainly pushed in that direction, not
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
We also now have a fantastic system for building the source with
multiple compliers. Using multiple different compliers is a great way
to find interesting bugs in the compiler and in the code you are
building.
Also the Studio compilers are free
And ON's gcc-shadow compilation does indeed uncover potential bugs, that
might not have been detected otherwise.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Perhaps engineering resources that went into making OpenSolaris
GCC-friendly would have been better spent porting SS10 to other
platforms? Were I the manager that had the power to decide, I would
have certainly pushed in that direction, not the other way around.
I heavily doubt, this would
Perhaps engineering resources that went into making OpenSolaris
GCC-friendly would have been better spent porting SS10 to other
platforms? Were I the manager that had the power to decide, I would
have certainly pushed in that direction, not the other way around.
The reasons those engineering
Why would Sun be so keen to pay people to port Solaris (which has a price
tag = FREE) and help HP, IBM etc to sell their hardware? It would end up
being Sun paying to port the code. HP and IBM selling the hardware, and HP
and IBM getting support contracts for maintaining Solaris on HP and
UNIX admin wrote:
Perhaps engineering resources that went into making
OpenSolaris GCC-friendly would have been better spent
porting SS10 to other platforms? Were I the manager
that had the power to decide, I would have certainly
pushed in that direction, not the other way around.
Both the
george r smith wrote:
My question is why isn't Sun keen in porting Eclipse to Solaris 10 (x86) and
help those of us who bought Sun boxes. I know about Netbeans but do a search
it is not used nearly as much as Ecliplse.
Maybe because Eclipse isn't pure java (trademark or not), so the
guards
11 matches
Mail list logo
