On 7/31/05, Shawn Leard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been involved with Linux since it was first available as a development
only
release. This length of time predates Solaris and extends back into the SunOS
days
so I feel I am in a position to offer good feedback.
It is early on a
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Dennis Clarke wrote:
down anytime soon. I feel that Rich Teer would be hunkering into his
chair and saying to himself ha, Dennis has another opinion breaking
out of the gates, this will be good!
You know me too well, my friend!
When Dennis writes tomes like this, who
On Jul 18, 2005, at 6:07 PM, UNIX admin wrote:
Am I the only one that doesn't like the
--something-or-other options
of GNU related software? Please don't do this to
Solaris!
No, you're not the only one. --options are completely uneccessary
and serve no purpose.
I sincerely hope such
On 7/15/05, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well on powerfull aspect of solaris command recall using the vi is the
ability to search and execute a command which is e.g. 20 in the history list
with a simple /, while in linux bash you have to hit the up arrow 20 times.
I think this makes the
George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well on powerfull aspect of solaris command recall using the vi is the
ability to search and execute a command which is e.g. 20 in the history list
with a simple /, while in linux bash you have to hit the up arrow 20 times.
I think this makes the speed
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/15/05, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well on powerfull aspect of solaris command recall using the vi is the
ability to search and execute a command which is e.g. 20 in the history
list with a simple /, while in linux bash you have to hit the
George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well on powerfull aspect of solaris command recall using the vi is the
ability to search and exe
cute a command which is e.g. 20 in the history list with a simple /, while in
linux bash you have
to hit the up arrow 20 times.
I think this makes the speed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well on powerfull aspect of solaris command recall using the vi is the ability
to search and exe
cute a command which is e.g. 20 in the history list with a simple /, while in
linux bash you have
to hit the up arrow 20 times.
I
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 19:47 -1000, Hawaii Linux Institute wrote:
One of the most exciting aspects of OpenSolaris is that, if you have
been following Sun's Blogs, many Sun's developers are triple-booting
their Ferrari notebooks with WinXP, Solaris, and Ubuntu. Ubuntu is the
hippest Linux
Hawaii Linux Institute wrote:
Robert Escue wrote:
And there are a number of people still spreading the slowaris FUD
around as if it is a matter of fact (which it isn't).
Depending on what you are doing, the characterizations of Solaris_86
as Slowaris, or more particularly, slOLDwaris,
Yes, in Solaris, Sun has stuck with good old Bourne Shell for the default root
shell. For users, the shell is up to the administrator. The bells and
whistles you are talking about in Linux come from them using BASH (Bourne Again
Shell) by default. As of Solaris 10 (or maybe 9) BASH comes
Yes, in Solaris, Sun has stuck with good old Bourne Shell for the def=
ault root shell. For users, the shell is up to the administrator. T=
he bells and whistles you are talking about in Linux come from them u=
sing BASH (Bourne Again Shell) by default. As of Solaris 10 (or mayb=
e 9) BASH
Albertson, Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, in Solaris, Sun has stuck with good old Bourne Shell for the default
root shell. For users, the shell is up to the administrator. The bells and
whistles you are talking about in Linux come from them using BASH (Bourne
Again Shell) by
13 matches
Mail list logo
