Yeah, me too. AA is buggy in 2, but its not working at all now.
On 8/26/2010 6:06 PM, Trilo Byte wrote:
> Is it just me, or is anti-aliasing broken in the last couple builds?
> 2.1.2 (208569) and 2.1.2 (208581)
>
> https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-20969
>
> TriloByte Zanzibar
> __
Hi Oz,
Looking through VWR-19505 I see the comment by the dev who made a fix
that you have requested a user story. Do we really need user stories
for bugs? There is effects setting in the main preferences floater,
there is a menu that enables to turn on and off the selection beam.
Why do you need
Is it just me, or is anti-aliasing broken in the last couple builds?
2.1.2 (208569) and 2.1.2 (208581)
https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-20969
TriloByte Zanzibar
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/
I've just updated the procedure for how to submit a changeset for
Snowstorm integration. There's now an explicit mechanism in Jira to
queue a change to be integrated. See
https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/How_To_Submit_A_Viewer_Change#Submission
This is a temporary procedure - it will be re
I think may be more usefull add all you asked in the jira opened about
multiattachments double worn :)
--
Sent by iPhone
Il giorno 27/ago/2010, alle ore 00:50, Brian McGroarty
ha scritto:
There were some fixes in 1.42 that dealt with a related MultipleAttachments
issue, and should have address
There were some fixes in 1.42 that dealt with a related MultipleAttachments
issue, and should have addressed the more general case.
If anyone encounters this while logging in with an account where you've
crashed or logged out today or later, would you please follow up with me in
direct email? If y
On 8/26/2010 15:54, Marine Kelley wrote:
> I understand, it makes sense, thanks for your reply Nyx. I did see the
> Add option on 2.1.0 along with MultipleAttachments there too so I
> assumed both were needed for some reason (this debug setting was used
> in a few places in the code).
>
So, M
I'd like to chime in and say that this happens to me often as well.
Attachments are worn twice on relog, approx. once a day. Since the
attachments I'm wearing usually say things with llOwnerSay and I see them
say their messages twice, I do know this is not only a viewer-side problem.
I have never o
I understand, it makes sense, thanks for your reply Nyx. I did see the Add
option on 2.1.0 along with MultipleAttachments there too so I assumed both
were needed for some reason (this debug setting was used in a few places in
the code).
On 26 August 2010 22:43, Nyx Linden wrote:
> Correct, that
Correct, that is what most people will do, and that's why we wanted to
keep the behavior of double click / "wear" to be consistent with how the
functionality worked in 1.23.X, as that's what most people are used to
those functions doing.
Since multi-wearables is a new feature, using the new fun
My mistake, then. When I performed the same action to wear an item as
I had in previous builds and got the unexpected/unwanted result, and
saw that the debug option was gone, I thought it had broken (like
anti-aliasing did in the latest build).
When this viewer gets released. it would be helpfu
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:24:08 -0400
Nyx Linden wrote:
> Let me know if this clarifies things.
yeah
i'm on Second Life 2.1.2 (208569) Aug 26 2010 05:22:24 (Second Life
Development) now, it work as you said, just noticed something weird and
tryiong to reproduce:
if i crash when relog all attac
"MultipleAttachments" was a debug setting we were using for testing
multi-attachments internally because we didn't have sufficient UI for
specifying what happened when you went to wear an item on your avatar.
To be clear, the setting "MultipleAttachments" affected the "wear"
option for atta
Trying to confirm the change (and how attachments look/don't look to 1.x
clients), and am finding that in 2.1.2 (298569) multiple attachments just
appears to be broken. I don't see a debug setting, I'm not finding a
preference option, and the feature is definitely not working in-world. Putting
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:06:53 +0100
Aidan Thornton wrote:
> >> I for one would very much like to see the MultipleAttachments debug
> >> setting come back and stay !
> >
> > i use multiple attachments, quite all users (but not emerald neither
> > imprudence) see them correctly, all kirsten viewers
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Altair Sythos wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:45:14 +0200
> Marine Kelley wrote:
>
>
>> I for one would very much like to see the MultipleAttachments debug
>> setting come back and stay !
>
> i use multiple attachments, quite all users (but not emerald neither
> i
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:45:14 +0200
Marine Kelley wrote:
> I for one would very much like to see the MultipleAttachments debug
> setting come back and stay !
i use multiple attachments, quite all users (but not emerald neither
imprudence) see them correctly, all kirsten viewers (on kirsten is
en
Hello all,
I am currently working at integrating the RLV code into the latest 2.1.2
viewer in "viewer-development". Some users might have noticed that the
"MultipleAttachments" debug setting was set to FALSE by default in order to
stay compatible with 1.x, because 1.x users cannot see attachments
Hi Aleric
On 08/26/2010 06:20 PM, Aleric Inglewood wrote:
> not withstanding testing-- I'd like to urge you to get this checked in
> ONE related SNOW-* jira at a time (except when they are totally related
> of course).
>
> Just wanted to express my "concerns" that all of these changes would
> end
On 2010-08-26 9:00, Francesco Rabbi wrote:
> I see in latest 2.1.2 builds kdu libs, but in "about second life" i
> see openjpeg is used, is a bug or a feature
In the process of splitting the public from non-public stuff that was in
the old private repository, the llkdu build was temporarily lef
Hey Boroondas,
not withstanding testing-- I'd like to urge you to get this checked in
ONE related SNOW-* jira at a time (except when they are totally related
of course).
Just wanted to express my "concerns" that all of these changes would
end up as a single commit.
I'd prefer to see them committ
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:16:22PM -0700, Erik Anderson wrote:
> " at the end (this is
> ). I'm guessing that it
> is
> thought that no one would notice these unless they were looking for them.
Surely you mean
?
Because after a quick look it's clear that is the '0'
and a '1', so that my v
On 08/26/2010 02:37 PM, Boroondas Gupte wrote:
> PS: Looks like upstream got some more changesets this morning, I'll
> provide a merge ASAP.
Here you go:
http://bitbucket.org/boroondas/snowstorm-development/changeset/5f58bebfb4ce
happy testing
Boroondas
___
I see in latest 2.1.2 builds kdu libs, but in "about second life" i
see openjpeg is used, is a bug or a feature?
--
Sent by iPhone
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the
User Story
As a Funtoo Linux (a Gentoo variant) 64bit user and volunteer viewer
developer, I want to build Snowstorm with the same build mode I already
use(d) for Snowglobe:
* native (i.e. 64bit)
* standalone
* out-of-source
I'd like to be able to do this for all three, Release,
Hello!
Probably no surprise to folks who've seen my last few days of
branch-juggling on hg.secondlife.com, but I finally got LL's
retired viewer-public branch converted to the new repo and merged into
viewer-development.
It's a fair amount of churn, but it should be the last of the big
merges nee
Hello,
1. I can't get the advanced sky window into the World dropdown. Something like
this I thought should work:
but doesn't. Any ideas?
2. And is there a way to get the 'East Angle' slider into the bottom bar? That
would really help me for taking photos, as I don't n
Hi.
Earlier this year I presented our work on using Snowglobe as a platform for
mixed reality meetings.
This includes controlling avatars by natural gestures and to be able to view
avatars as if they would
be located in the same room as the user.
I opened two "new feature" issues into SL Jira
Is MediaAPI mailing list supposed to be working?
Maybe the list should be closed - or instead its existence
should be advertised again in order to promote activity.
There were no replies to the following questions, that were
the only message in the last months.
Opensource Obscure
Origi
29 matches
Mail list logo
