On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 12:37:59PM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> > > ... wondered what
> > > happens if you attempt to compile it with -DSHA_XARRAY (as that's
> > > actually what is *essentially* different between 0.9.4 and 0.9.5).
> >
> > Ok, the compilation at +O3 has now jumped over the sha_dg
> > ... wondered what
> > happens if you attempt to compile it with -DSHA_XARRAY (as that's
> > actually what is *essentially* different between 0.9.4 and 0.9.5).
>
> Ok, the compilation at +O3 has now jumped over the sha_dgst.c hurdle
> and is very busy with rmd_dgst.c... Checked into rmd_dgst.c
Hi all,
As read from many sources i understood that when a certificate is revoked it
is no longer valid and CA keeps track of revoked certificates in certificate
revokation list(CRL).
We have Netscape Certificate Server as CA and keeps track of CRL.
In my server(developed using stunnel and opens
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 12:19:24AM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> > > > The latest snapshot will only compile with "+O2" but not with the higher
> > > > optimizations at "+O3" and "+O4".
> > > > - At "+O3" it will optimize on a "by file" technique and it does hang at
> > > > crypto/sha/sha_dgst.c
