RE: I can't make

Looks like your OS wasnt properly installed for development. Make sure you have your kernel headers installed. Mike > -Original Message- > From: KiaK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 2:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: I can't make > > > This Error Re

Newbie question

This is a newbie question.   Sorry in advance if this is the wrong place to send this message (and if I'm in the wrong place, just let me know: I won't send emails here again).   I'm considering porting the ssl code (client-side only) onto an embedded device (a.k.a. Internet appliance) to a

RE: Newbie question - Diff Between SSL3.0 and TLS1.0

Frederic, For your latter question, look at the following book "SSL and TLS Essentials: Securing the Web" by Stephen Thomas (c) 2000, published by Wiley. He does an excellent job covering the details of the SSL protocol and gives the specific differences between SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0. In a nut shell

RE: Newbie question - Diff Between SSL3.0 and TLS1.0

Uuuh, that's new "alert" messages. Thanks spell checker! dmw -Original Message- From: Wheeler, David M AZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 8:37 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Newbie question - Diff Between SSL3.0 and TLS1.0 Frederic, For your latter ques

How to get tthe rpivate key from a pkcs12 file

Hi All, Can someone tell me how to get the private key from a pkcs12 file , basically I want to sign jars using javakey . Cristian Roldan __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development

RE: How to get tthe rpivate key from a pkcs12 file

> Can someone tell me how to get the private key from a > pkcs12 file, basically I want to sign jars using javakey . ``man pkcs12'' ? ;) Martin -- Martin Krumpolec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ OpenSSL Project

Re: [PATCH] avail of Pentium hardware RNG (at least minimally) on Windoze

This may not be a good idea in the long run - not due to its intended purpose, but due to conflicting function calls between crypt32 on windows2000 and within libeay on the win2k platform. I've noticed them within the win2k sdk and if NOCRYPT is not defined the build will fail on 2k using the cry

Requests for Build changes

I'm trying to get Windows builds working "better" (a relative term, of course ) I would like to see the following changes if I can get them: For Borland C++ Builds: 1) There is a function called ERR_load_CRYPTO_strings in the generated file "cpt_err.c", and another function called ERR_loa

Re: [PATCH]

> *** ms/ntdll.mak.orig Thu Apr 27 13:54:12 2000 > --- ms/ntdll.makThu Apr 27 14:01:21 2000 ntdll.mak is a user generated file from within ms/do_*.bat Andrew __ OpenSSL Project http://ww

Re: Requests for Build changes

Hi there, Unfortunately the laws governing exports of software from the US are still not yet cut-and-dried. If you are sending patches from the US, there's unfortunately a very real risk of "contamination" of the code base if we incorporate them. We have been obtaining legal opinion on this issue

Re: Requests for Build changes

On Aug 4, 1:26pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote: > Hi there, > > Unfortunately the laws governing exports of software from the US are still > not yet cut-and-dried. If you are sending patches from the US, there's > unfortunately a very real risk of "contamination" of the code base if we > incorporate them.

RE: Requests for Build changes

H. I see. Well, how 'bout if I just report every one of these as a bug? Will that help appease legal dudes and, more importantly, the roaming aliens? Try this: Bug: Borland builds fail because "-6" isn't on the BCC32 command line. Pentium Pro instructions are used in this build, and in o

Re: Requests for Build changes

Geoff: I do not speak for the OpenSSL core team (especially because I am not a member of it) but I believe that the opinion voiced below does not reflect the opinion of all Core Team members. At least not from the conversations that I remember from the openssl-dev list that took place last Feb.