Looks like your OS wasnt properly installed for
development. Make sure you have your kernel
headers installed.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: KiaK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 2:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: I can't make
>
>
> This Error Re
This is a newbie question.
Sorry in advance if this is the wrong place to send
this message (and if I'm in the wrong place, just let me know: I won't send
emails here again).
I'm considering porting the ssl code (client-side
only) onto an embedded device (a.k.a. Internet appliance) to a
Frederic,
For your latter question, look at the following book "SSL and TLS
Essentials: Securing the Web" by Stephen Thomas (c) 2000, published by
Wiley. He does an excellent job covering the details of the SSL protocol and
gives the specific differences between SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0. In a nut shell
Uuuh, that's new "alert" messages. Thanks spell checker!
dmw
-Original Message-
From: Wheeler, David M AZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 8:37 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Newbie question - Diff Between SSL3.0 and TLS1.0
Frederic,
For your latter ques
Hi All,
Can someone tell me how to get the private key from a pkcs12 file ,
basically I want to sign jars using javakey .
Cristian Roldan
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development
> Can someone tell me how to get the private key from a
> pkcs12 file, basically I want to sign jars using javakey .
``man pkcs12'' ? ;)
Martin
--
Martin Krumpolec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
OpenSSL Project
This may not be a good idea in the long run - not due to its intended
purpose, but due to conflicting function calls between crypt32 on
windows2000 and within libeay on the win2k platform. I've noticed them
within the win2k sdk and if NOCRYPT is not defined the build will fail
on 2k using the cry
I'm trying to get Windows builds working "better" (a relative term, of
course )
I would like to see the following changes if I can get them:
For Borland C++ Builds:
1) There is a function called ERR_load_CRYPTO_strings in the generated
file "cpt_err.c", and another function called ERR_loa
> *** ms/ntdll.mak.orig Thu Apr 27 13:54:12 2000
> --- ms/ntdll.makThu Apr 27 14:01:21 2000
ntdll.mak is a user generated file from within ms/do_*.bat
Andrew
__
OpenSSL Project http://ww
Hi there,
Unfortunately the laws governing exports of software from the US are still
not yet cut-and-dried. If you are sending patches from the US, there's
unfortunately a very real risk of "contamination" of the code base if we
incorporate them. We have been obtaining legal opinion on this issue
On Aug 4, 1:26pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Unfortunately the laws governing exports of software from the US are still
> not yet cut-and-dried. If you are sending patches from the US, there's
> unfortunately a very real risk of "contamination" of the code base if we
> incorporate them.
H. I see. Well, how 'bout if I just report every one of these as a
bug? Will that help appease legal dudes and, more importantly, the roaming
aliens? Try this:
Bug: Borland builds fail because "-6" isn't on the BCC32 command line.
Pentium Pro instructions are used in this build, and in o
Geoff:
I do not speak for the OpenSSL core team (especially because I am not
a member of it) but I believe that the opinion voiced below does not
reflect the opinion of all Core Team members. At least not from the
conversations that I remember from the openssl-dev list that took
place last Feb.
13 matches
Mail list logo