Re: Revised DOS patch for openssl-0.9.7

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:21:42AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > dkaufman> After running "make depend", the next error is due to lack > dkaufman> of "bn_sub_part_words". This was addressed in my patch for > dkaufman> both DJGPP and Cygwin. > > Ah, so that's what that is about. >

Re: EVP incompatibility from 0.9.6 to 0.9.7

> > The EVP interface has been changed between 0.9.6 and 0.9.7 in an > > incompatible way. We are aware of problems caused by this change > > and there is currently an internal discussion going on how > > to handle the situation, including the option to revert to the > > old behavior. > > In any c

Re: Revised DOS patch for openssl-0.9.7

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 10:11:08AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > gcc -o openssl -DMONOLITH -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_CYGWIN32 >-DOPENSSL_THREADS -DDSO_WIN32 -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN >-fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486 -Wall openssl.o verify.o asn1pars.o req.o dgst.o dh.o

Missing define in err.h

In OpenSSL 0.9.6, file err.h, there is a define: #define ERR_file_name __FILE__ which is missing is 0.9.7. Is this by design or accident? Ken __ Support InterSoft International, Inc. Voice: 888-823-1541, International 281-398-7060 Fax: 888-823

Re: Missing define in err.h

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 07:25:50AM -0500, Kenneth R. Robinette wrote: > In OpenSSL 0.9.6, file err.h, there is a define: > > #define ERR_file_name __FILE__ > > which is missing is 0.9.7. Is this by design or accident? >From the log of err.h 1.24 -> 1.25 Get rid of '#define ERR_file_name __F

SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list

I am trying to fix an old Open Source application using BIO_do_handshake, and convert that app to use OpenSSL 0.9.7. During testing, I discovered that the application would work when using the OpenSSL Window dll's, but not when static linked. What it comes down to is the application is using un

Re: Revised DOS patch for openssl-0.9.7

On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > ../libcrypto.a(bn_mul.o)(.text+0x44b):bn_mul.c: undefined reference to >`bn_sub_part_words' > > [...] > > > > so it's pretty generic. > > The problem is line 61 in crypto/bn/bn_mul.c: > > #if defined(OPENSSL_NO_ASM) || !(defined(__i386) || de

Re: Revised DOS patch for openssl-0.9.7

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 07:51:27AM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote: > On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > ../libcrypto.a(bn_mul.o)(.text+0x44b):bn_mul.c: undefined reference to >`bn_sub_part_words' > > > [...] > > > > > > so it's pretty generic. > > > > The problem is line 61 in cry

Re: SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 09:21:01AM -0500, Kenneth R. Robinette wrote: > What it comes down to is the application is using undefined methods > to force the SSL cipher list to only contain RSA:NULL:MD5 in the > client cipher list. However, by using these unsupported methods, the > app is not cal

make test fails on aix 4.3/gcc for OpenSSL 0.9.6d beta 1

./config make make test ends in ../certs/tjhCA.pem: /C=AU/ST=Queensland/L=Brisbane/O=CryptSoft Pty Ltd/OU=WORTHLESS CERTIFICATION AUTHORITIES/CN=ZERO VALUE CA - DEMONSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY error 10 at 0 depth lookup:certificate has expired OK ../certs/vsign1.pem: OK ../certs/vsign2.pem: OK ../ce

Re: problem with openssl-0.9.6c on AIX3.2 (fwd)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:12:31 -0700 (PDT), Nir Goldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: nir> Hi Richard (and list), nir> nir> Thank you very much for the help and your spreedy reply. The machine in nir> question is a very old IBM RS/6000 running AIX3.2. I tried instal

Re: problem with openssl-0.9.6c on AIX3.2, revisited

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:31:05 -0700 (PDT), Nir Goldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: nir> I apologize for the plethora of emails I'm sending out. I reinstalled the nir> /usr/include directory and got rid of the stdio.h errors I was getting, nir> and finally dso_dlfc

Re: problem with openssl-0.9.6c on AIX3.2 (fwd)

Here you go: uname -m 12345C00 uname -r 2 uname -s AIX uname -v 3 xlc can't recognize the MAXMEM option because it doesn't exist for this version of the compiler. I had assumed that I would be able to build the code anyway. I looked at the man page for xlc and there didn't seem to be an

Re: problem with openssl-0.9.6c on AIX3.2, revisited

I apologize for the plethora of emails I'm sending out. I reinstalled the /usr/include directory and got rid of the stdio.h errors I was getting, and finally dso_dlfcn.c was able to compile. However, I still can't complete the build. Here's a list of the currents errors: making all in crypt

PKCS #12

Title: PKCS #12 Dear OpenSSL Developers, I need to generate PKCS#12 private key files from CryptoApi Key Containers. I'd tried to use Xenroll, OpenSSL and the RSA's PKCS#12 specification, but the files I'm generating have not been recognized as valid pkcs#12 files by another application tha

Re: problem with openssl-0.9.6c on AIX3.2 (fwd)

Hi Richard (and list), Thank you very much for the help and your spreedy reply. The machine in question is a very old IBM RS/6000 running AIX3.2. I tried installing gcc-2.95 (figuring an older version had a better chance of working) and it didn't work. As a result, I tried the ./Configure l

Hpux 11i

I have been trying to configure open ssl for hpux. I need this in order to run a cgi interface over a secure connection. I am rebuilding apache therefore I could potentially "make certificate" and be on my way. unfortunately when I go to configure openssl (build 0.9.6.c) It looks for a perl file

error in RC4 multi-call processing on MacOS X 10.1.4 with OpenSSL 0.9.6c

Checking compiler... ar: creating archive cctest.a Running make... + rm -f libcrypto + rm -f libssl making all in crypto... making all in crypto/md2... make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. making all in crypto/md4... make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. making all in crypto/md5... make[3]: Not