Re: PATCH: Elimination of unused 10k stack variable

2002-05-09 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 08 May 2002 17:31:41 -0600, "Verdon Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: VWalker> This patch fixes the routine BIO_vprintf in VWalker> crypto\bio\b_print.c so that no longer allocates a 10k buffer VWalker> on the stack that is never really used. I just looked

[openssl.org #8] EVP_SealFinal declared void while the docu states it returns int

2002-05-09 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Apr 25 16:16:02 2002]: > Is this the expected behaviour ? Either way one must be fixed :) > Btw EVP_OpenFinal does exactly what EVP_SealFinal does and adds to > this the return value... Hmm, I think Steve should answer this one. Personally, I think this shows a certai

Re: [openssl.org #19] INSTALL_PREFIX ignored

2002-05-09 Thread Bryan Henderson
>> The main make file does not use INSTALL_PREFIX in installing some of >> the files in OPENSSLDIR. >I'm probably blind... I'm looking at the current development branch >(0.9.8-dev) and can't see where the use of INSTALL_PREFIX is missing. It was pretty obvious to me when I reported the proble

Re: PATCH: Elimination of unused 10k stack variable

2002-05-09 Thread Verdon Walker
It is always painful to admit when you are wrong, but hopefully I will save at least some face by doing it now. You are correct that the static buffer is used and dynamic buffer is only used when the static buffer runs out of space. In my defense, I did post an inquiry about the code before submi

[openssl.org #26] 64 bit Suse Linux on PowerPC

2002-05-09 Thread
Hello to all, I am trying to compile on a 64 bit Suse sles7 powerpc system. the error message indicates -m486 is an invalid compiler parameter. Anyone know the parameters I need to give ./config to get it to work for 64 bit Suse on a powerpc below are the results from running ./config with

Re: PATCH: Elimination of unused 10k stack variable

2002-05-09 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 09 May 2002 14:06:26 -0600, "Verdon Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: VWalker> make the buffer allocated on the stack a more reasonable size VWalker> - say 1 or 2k. For everyone's info, I just decided to do exactly that. The buffer in question has diminis

Re: [openssl.org #26] 64 bit Suse Linux on PowerPC

2002-05-09 Thread Tim Rice
On Thu, 9 May 2002, John Bihlmeyer via RT wrote: > > Hello to all, > I am trying to compile on a 64 bit Suse sles7 powerpc system. > the error message indicates > > -m486 > > is an invalid compiler parameter. Anyone know the parameters I need to give > ./config to > get it to work for 64 bit Su

[openssl.org #26] 64 bit Suse Linux on PowerPC

2002-05-09 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu May 9 22:13:32 2002]: > I am trying to compile on a 64 bit Suse sles7 powerpc system. > the error message indicates > > -m486 > > is an invalid compiler parameter. Anyone know the parameters I need to give > ./config to > get it to work for 64 bit Suse on a powerpc???

[openssl.org #27] AutoReply: Legalizing OpenSSL in France

2002-05-09 Thread OpenSSL-Bugs
Greetings, This message has been automatically generated in response to the creation of a trouble ticket regarding: "Legalizing OpenSSL in France", a summary of which appears below. There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has been assigned an ID

Re: PATCH: Elimination of unused 10k stack variable

2002-05-09 Thread David Schwartz
For what it's worth, here are all the functions with over 4Kb of stack usage (at least, the way I compiled/analyzed it) for OpenSSL-0.9.6c. 4108 PKCS7_decrypt 4124 SMIME_text 4236 PKCS7_verify 4252 PKCS12_pbe_crypt 4268 PKCS12_decrypt_d2i 4268 PKCS12_i2d_encrypt 4380 PKCS5_pbe2_set 4764