[openssl.org #269] [PATCH] Support for Subject Directory Attributes redux

This patch is a replacement for RT/openssl.org: Ticket #237. Please retract Ticket #237. The following patch provides basic support for Subject Directory Attributes, which are defined in the x509 spec (RFC 2459), but are currently unsupported by OpenSSL. openssl.cnf entries for Subject Di

[openssl.org #270] API: certificate chain handling incomplete

I noticed that that the functions SSL_CTX_use_certificate_file and SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file are available for use with an SSL_CTX *, yet there is no "chain" version available to set with an SSL *, only SSL_use_certificate_file and friends. Any particular reason for this? Tom -- To

Re: [openssl.org #270] API: certificate chain handling incomplete

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 09:36:09AM +0200, Tom Wu via RT wrote: > > I noticed that that the functions SSL_CTX_use_certificate_file and > SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file are available for use with an SSL_CTX > *, yet there is no "chain" version available to set with an SSL *, only > SSL_use_

[openssl.org #268] Very minor documentation patch

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Sep 4 21:15:50 2002]: ... > The comments above say "URI", but the example shows "URL". Thanks, fixed. Best regards, __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development

[openssl.org #263] Apparently Missing "OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms" in 0.9.7-beta3

[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Sep 1 19:01:48 2002]: > In compiling MySql-4.0.2-alpha, I get the following error messages > related to OpenSSL shown below. > > Using STRINGS to check the differences between OpenSSL-0.9.6a and > OpenSSL-0.9.7-beta3 shows "OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms" in 0.9.6a but >

Re: Ressource leak in chil ? [hw_ncipher.c]

Since I wrote that I have also observed the LoadBLOB No Memory on one server consitently - but not on some other much busier servers. I am using the same apache binary on all these servers, and they're all solaris 8, but I have not compared the hwcrhk libs or hardserver version. So I will do t

Re: Ressource leak in chil ? [hw_ncipher.c]

Peter Viertel wrote: > -rwxrwxr-x 1 root bin 921856 Apr 5 2001 libnfhwcrhk.so > The only difference I can see is the hardserver binary is different on > each box - the package version of NCnfast on each is 1.72.3 but on the We have 1.78.11, libnfhwchrk.so size is 1158332 and hardser

[openssl.org #265] Bug Report - Ordinal 2915 cannot be found in Libeay32.dll

This problem has been resolved. int EVP_EncryptInit_ex(EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx, const EVP_CIPHER *type, ENGINE *impl, unsigned char *key, unsigned char *iv); EVP_EncryptInit_ex(&ctx, EVP_bf_cbc(), NULL, key, iv); In the example at http://www.openssl.org/docs/crypto/EVP_EncryptInit.html#E

Re: Ressource leak in chil ? [hw_ncipher.c]

Juergen Brauckmann wrote: > We now applied the nCipher patches from their NCsslypd package (which > also use libnfhwcrhk.so) to non-engine openssl 0.9.6g. The patches are > for openssl 0.9.6b, but whith some trivial changes they work for openssl > 0.9.6g too. > > This works much better, no NoMemo

Is the openssl.org site down?

I haven't been able to access it for two days now. I can traceroute to it, but every html client times out. I have tried different browsers and even text based http clients, e.g. links. Thanks -Baber __ OpenSSL Project

Re: Is the openssl.org site down?

Baber Amin wrote: > > I haven't been able to access it for two days now. I can traceroute to it, but >every html client times out. I have tried different browsers and even text based >http clients, e.g. links. Looks like the web server process is down. I haven't been able to get to http://w