[openssl.org #278] Open SSL Install Question

2002-09-11 Thread
Hi, I was installing Open SSL on my Linux 7.3 system and seen the following message at the end of the make test step. Does this mean the ./config and make steps were unsuccessful? Any information you can provide would be helpful. Thanks in advance, Marty gcc -I../include -fPIC -DTHREADS

[openssl.org #279] Solaris 2.8 issue w/ fopen in openssl-0.9.6g/crypto/bio/bss_file.c

2002-09-11 Thread Craig Kaes via RT
I'm running a (jabber) socket multiplexor that provides both SSL and non-SSL interfaces. The short story is that it manages multiple long-lived TCP connections. I have no problems connecting via SSL until the total number of connections exceeds about 250. After this point, non-ssl

Re: [openssl.org #279] Solaris 2.8 issue w/ fopen in openssl-0.9.6g/crypto/bio/bss_file.c

2002-09-11 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:21:09AM +0200, Craig Kaes via RT wrote: OPEN_MAX, the max # of fds allowable to me is honored by fopen and on BSD and Gnu this value tracks ulimit values. On Solaris, tho, it appears hard coded. To wit: [craigk:~/tmp/fopen]$ cat foo.c #include stdio.h

[openssl.org #280] error msg making openssl

2002-09-11 Thread
I sent e-mail in English before. Anyway I'm sending it again. --- I trird to run make command while installing openssl 0.9.6g. But I got the following error.(first log including make report) Af first I just modified Makefile in sub

[openssl.org #278] Open SSL Install Question

2002-09-11 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Sep 11 09:20:08 2002]: I was installing Open SSL on my Linux 7.3 system and seen the following message at the end of the make test step. Does this mean the ./config and make steps were unsuccessful? Any information you can provide would be helpful. I

[openssl.org #280] error msg making openssl

2002-09-11 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Sep 11 09:48:53 2002]: I sent e-mail in English before. Anyway I'm sending it again. You sent as: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ks_c_5601-1987 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 This character set is not well supported by several mail clients (and by

[openssl.org #281] bug in HP-UX makefile in 0.9.6e

2002-09-11 Thread Tapani Tarvainen via RT
Hi, It seems there's a small bug in shlib/hpux10-cc.sh in OpenSSL 0.9.6g: there're several references to 0.9.6e in the script, which should be changed to 0.9.6g. -- Tapani Tarvainen __ OpenSSL Project

Re: [openssl.org #280] error msg making openssl

2002-09-11 Thread
I'm sorry I can't understand what you mean. Is what you mean that I need to reinstall GCC on higher version ? Before I make openssl, I tried to install GCC on higher version. But it didn't work.(It also had problem when makinganother msg) So I installed GCC on 2.7 version. At that time

[openssl.org #280] error msg making openssl

2002-09-11 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Sep 11 10:46:32 2002]: I'm sorry I can't understand what you mean. Is what you mean that I need to reinstall GCC on higher version ? Before I make openssl, I tried to install GCC on higher version. But it didn't work.(It also had problem when

[openssl.org #198] Bug Report

2002-09-11 Thread via RT
[levitte - Thu Aug 15 12:53:23 2002]: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Aug 6 17:38:02 2002]: Ive installed and configurd all of the above, and have gotten to the apache build process and encounter the following error: /usr/lib/libssl.a(ssl_cert.o): In function `ssl_verify_cert_chain':

[openssl.org #282]

2002-09-11 Thread via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #279] Solaris 2.8 issue w/ fopen in openssl-0.9.6g/crypto/bio/bss_file.c

2002-09-11 Thread Prasanth
Craig, This appears to bea solaris issue. This is becauseSun Folks used aunsigned char (store upto 256 )to handle the file descriptors. #endif /* __STDC__ */ typedef struct /* needs to be binary-compatible with old versions */{#ifdef _STDIO_REVERSE unsigned char *_ptr; /* next

[openssl.org #283] Documentation for d2i_RSAPrivateKey etc (1/1)

2002-09-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Functions like d2i_RSAPrivateKey are poorly documented at present: the docs just say ... for all sections. Since I investigated how to use them, I've written documentation, attached. __ OpenSSL Project

Re: Problem calling PKCS12_gen_mac() twice

2002-09-11 Thread Ben Laurie
Stefan Richter wrote: Hi all, i have a problem with the PKCS12_gen_mac() which is called from within PKCS12_verify_mac(). I've a function which extracts the private key from a PKCS#12 file. If I call it once all is fine, but if I call it twice (with the same or another PKCS#12 file) the

Re: [openssl.org #279] Solaris 2.8 issue w/ fopen in openssl-0.9.6g/crypto/bio/bss_file.c

2002-09-11 Thread Craig Kaes
I appreciate that I am now on my own. FWIW, though, your statement below is untrue, at least on Solaris 8. Open is not limited in the same way that fopen is w/ regard to # of fds. Also, fwiw, nether is socket(2). OPEN: [craigk:/tmp]$ cat /home/craigk/tmp/fopen/foo2.c #include stdio.h