Re: Finally time for IPvn support

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 04 Oct 2004 15:33:46 -0700, Lev Walkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: vlm Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: [...] vlm So, I'm looking for proposals on a new syntax to separate IP address vlm from port number. Any suggestion? vlm vlm This is how Cisco does

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 04 Oct 2004 15:33:46 -0700, Lev Walkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: vlm Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: [...] vlm So, I'm looking for proposals on a new syntax to separate IP address vlm from port number. Any suggestion?

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 05 Oct 2004 02:41:24 -0700, Howard Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: hyc The Cisco solution *is* the standard solution: hyc http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2732.txt hyc hyc It would be best to avoid any non-standard formats... Thanks! Decision made (and I'll extend

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: hyc It would be best to avoid any non-standard formats... Thanks! Decision made (and I'll extend it a bit to allow [ and ] around IPv4 addresses and host names as well, mostly because I'm lazy). If I think hard enough, I could probably think of ways that

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 05 Oct 2004 06:31:43 -0700, Gianni Mariani [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: gianni Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: gianni gianni hyc It would be best to avoid any non-standard formats... gianni gianni Thanks! Decision made (and I'll extend it a bit to allow [

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: gianni If I think hard enough, I could probably think of ways that gianni this would break things. Well, let's see, we have two places where this is relevant. One is the simple {host}:{port} combination, the other is the URL http://{host}:{port}/... In both

PKCS7: sign data without keeping it in the memory

Hello folks, I sent this mail in July but it was dropped (my email address changed...): PKCS7_sign() has the disadvantage that all signed data must be kept in memory. My patch addes a PKCS7_signHash() that allows cereating of a PKCS7 signed object just from the digest of the data. Intendet usage:

[openssl.org #953] PKCS7: sign data without keeping it in the memory

__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:41:48 -0400, Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: jaltman Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: jaltman jaltman gianni If I think hard enough, I could probably think of ways that jaltman gianni this would break things. jaltman jaltman

Adding a new Cipher

Hello all, we are working to integrate a new cipher (aes-ccm) into the crypto lib. We want to have the new algorithm available from every application linking the library but we have not found where we have to add the cipher definition to have it listed among the available ones. Can you help us ???

[openssl.org #943] make test failed

I'm having exactly the same signal 11 problem with my make test. And, I have the same configuration (Windows 2000, latest Cygwin, and openssl-0.9.7d). Similarly, configure and compile both worked fine. Please let me know if you find the solution... Thanks, Shawn

Re: Adding a new Cipher

Hello all, we are working to integrate a new cipher (aes-ccm) into the crypto lib. We want to have the new algorithm available from every application linking the library but we have not found where we have to add the cipher definition to have it listed among the available ones. Can you