On October 27, 2005 02:47 pm, Martin Del Vecchio wrote:
> I get an error similar to what I was seeing before; it can't find the
> symbol
> 'ubsec_bytes_to_bits':
>
> error:2506406A:DSO support routines:DLFCN_BIND_FUNC:could not bind to
> the requested symbol name (dso_dlfcn.c:261)
>-> symname
Update: I noticed it was looking in the wrong path (/home/armckinn/...
etc).
I rebuilt the library without setting the --prefix in the ./config
command.
It then was looking for the shared library in
/usr/local/ssl/lib/engines/libubsec.so.
That directory didn't exist, so I created it and copied
/
You say "it should fall back to automatically searching the default path
to load the engine shared lib (libubsec.so)". I guess this isn't
happening.
I found the uBSec shared library in /usr/lib/engines/libubsec.so. I
added the following
code to my test program to load it via the dynamic engine:
[guest - Thu Oct 6 11:55:10 2005]:
> I notice that the chil engine in 0.9.8 has had the hack which allows
> it to work with static locks removed.
That is correct. The reason is exactly what you said; it's a hack, and
it was *meant* to be temporary, to allow for a smooth move from the 0.9.
6
Greetings!
I've got a segmentation fault in openssl-0.9.8a.
../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./sha512t
make[2]: *** [test_sha] Illegal instruction
OpenSSL self-test report:
OpenSSL version: 0.9.8a
Last change: Remove the functionality of
SSL_OP_MSIE_SSLV2_RSA_PADDI...
Options: -g enable-sha
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:01:23 -0400, Johnny Lam
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jlam> What makes you think that the OpenSSL developers will go to the
jlam> trouble to do all this major surgery to their codebase when they
jlam> won't d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:01:23 -0400, Johnny Lam
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jlam> What makes you think that the OpenSSL developers will go to the
jlam> trouble to do all this major surgery to their codebase when they
jlam> won't do the very simple thing of just properl
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:49:53 +0530, Pradosh
Adoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pradosh.adoni> though it has been fairly established that the
pradosh.adoni> resulting ABI will in all probabilty break in
pradosh.adoni> forthcoming (major) versions, It would be good to kn
Pradosh Adoni wrote:
(I had sent this mail earlier, but it didn't seem to make it to the list )
Carrying forward from earlier discussion threads which I have linked
here for reference -
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg19662.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@op
Hi,
(I had sent this mail earlier, but it didn't seem to make it to the list )
Carrying forward from earlier discussion threads which I have linked
here for reference -
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg19662.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg19158.
Test
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2005.10.26 at 19:37:34 +0100, upinder singh wrote:
>
>2) I have my own C implementation of the AES(rijndael) algo as also of
>the SHA-256 hash fn,UMAC,RSA and a PRBG to generate symmetric keys.All
>these are software implementations only.
>
>
>
>3)I want to plug in these and
12 matches
Mail list logo
