Re: Plug-in own crypto routines with ssl

2005-10-27 Thread Victor B. Wagner
On 2005.10.26 at 19:37:34 +0100, upinder singh wrote: 2) I have my own C implementation of the AES(rijndael) algo as also of the SHA-256 hash fn,UMAC,RSA and a PRBG to generate symmetric keys.All these are software implementations only. 3)I want to plug in these and use

Test

2005-10-27 Thread Sundaram, Balaji
Test __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

LSB inclusion of OpenSSL

2005-10-27 Thread Pradosh Adoni
Hi, (I had sent this mail earlier, but it didn't seem to make it to the list ) Carrying forward from earlier discussion threads which I have linked here for reference - http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg19662.html

Re: LSB inclusion of OpenSSL

2005-10-27 Thread Johnny Lam
Pradosh Adoni wrote: (I had sent this mail earlier, but it didn't seem to make it to the list ) Carrying forward from earlier discussion threads which I have linked here for reference - http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg19662.html

Re: LSB inclusion of OpenSSL

2005-10-27 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:49:53 +0530, Pradosh Adoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: pradosh.adoni though it has been fairly established that the pradosh.adoni resulting ABI will in all probabilty break in pradosh.adoni forthcoming (major) versions, It would be good to know

Re: LSB inclusion of OpenSSL

2005-10-27 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:01:23 -0400, Johnny Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: jlam What makes you think that the OpenSSL developers will go to the jlam trouble to do all this major surgery to their codebase when they jlam won't do the very simple thing of just properly

Re: LSB inclusion of OpenSSL

2005-10-27 Thread Johnny Lam
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:01:23 -0400, Johnny Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: jlam What makes you think that the OpenSSL developers will go to the jlam trouble to do all this major surgery to their codebase when they jlam won't do the

[openssl.org #1231] [BUG]Illegal instruction in 0.9.8a

2005-10-27 Thread Dmitry Belyavsky via RT
Greetings! I've got a segmentation fault in openssl-0.9.8a. ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./sha512t make[2]: *** [test_sha] Illegal instruction OpenSSL self-test report: OpenSSL version: 0.9.8a Last change: Remove the functionality of SSL_OP_MSIE_SSLV2_RSA_PADDI... Options: -g

RE: Problem using Broadcom uBSec engine in 0.9.8

2005-10-27 Thread Martin Del Vecchio
You say it should fall back to automatically searching the default path to load the engine shared lib (libubsec.so). I guess this isn't happening. I found the uBSec shared library in /usr/lib/engines/libubsec.so. I added the following code to my test program to load it via the dynamic engine:

RE: Problem using Broadcom uBSec engine in 0.9.8

2005-10-27 Thread Martin Del Vecchio
Update: I noticed it was looking in the wrong path (/home/armckinn/... etc). I rebuilt the library without setting the --prefix in the ./config command. It then was looking for the shared library in /usr/local/ssl/lib/engines/libubsec.so. That directory didn't exist, so I created it and copied

Re: Problem using Broadcom uBSec engine in 0.9.8

2005-10-27 Thread Geoff Thorpe
On October 27, 2005 02:47 pm, Martin Del Vecchio wrote: I get an error similar to what I was seeing before; it can't find the symbol 'ubsec_bytes_to_bits': error:2506406A:DSO support routines:DLFCN_BIND_FUNC:could not bind to the requested symbol name (dso_dlfcn.c:261) -