Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> David,
>
> I think you have a problem of not making clear what you actually mean.
>
> I'm going to give 3 examples of how I could read what you were saying so
> far:
>
> 1. A client connects to a server, but the server has been compromised
>and someone knows it's secret k
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 02:50:55AM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
>
> Ted T'so wrote:
>
> > At this point, you've just spent reams and reams of electrons stating
> > the obvious.
>
> Yes, for the second time, because some people *still* don't understand it.
> (It's quite obvious to you and me, not
Michael Sierchio wrote:
> Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> > As the old saying goes, "better to be silent, and thought to be a
> > fool, and to speak, and remove all doubt."
>
> "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no
> wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two tho
Ted T'so wrote:
> At this point, you've just spent reams and reams of electrons stating
> the obvious.
Yes, for the second time, because some people *still* don't understand it.
(It's quite obvious to you and me, not so obvious to the people who still
don't get it.)
> If the endpoint is comprom
