Hello All,
Currently, EC_POINT_cmp (from ec_lib.c) returns 0 in case of
group->meth->point_cmp==0 or other error.
However, ec_GF2m_simple_cmp, ec_GFp_simple_cmp and other comparison functions
return 0 if the points are equal, or -1 on error.
Should we apply the following patch?
--
Best r
Hello,
ech_ossl.c includes , but it is not needed there, the line
"#include " can be safely removed.
Could you please remove it?
I've tried to compile a small stand-alone ECDH application that doesn't us
SHA, and had to remove this line by myself.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Hello All,
Currently, EC_POINT_cmp (from ec_lib.c) returns 0 in case of
group->meth->point_cmp==0 or other error.
However, ec_GF2m_simple_cmp, ec_GFp_simple_cmp and other comparison functions
return 0 if the points are equal, or -1 on error.
Should we apply the following patch?
Index: ec_li
Hi all.
Just wandering whether there is something I am missing about posting
bug reports/patches to 'r...@openssl.org'. I send a report there three
days ago and got neither any confirmation nor did the report get
forwarded to the development list. I resent the same report yesterday
and st
Hi,
I am new to the TLS/SSL protocol.
I am exploring the idea of extending OpenSSL to perform authenticated
key exchanges using symmetric techniques running from smart cards and
falling back to asymmetric key exchanges in the normal way if the
smart cards are not present or do not recognis
Hi Benjamin:
It sounds to me like you'd probably have better luck adding to the TLS
protocol by taking this discussion to the IETF TLS working group.
While there are a number of protocol experts on this list, I think that
your idea would get more of a workout on the list where the people that
sta
I'm having difficulty understanding how to link an additional *.a
library in with the build structure. It needs to be linked in as a
component of the aes crypto algorithm. OpenSSL/crypto/aes. I want to
use this library to add support for some hardware acceleration.
Thank you for the support.
-
2009/3/6 Erwann ABALEA :
> Hello,
>
> Hodie III Non. Mar. MMIX, Sune Rievers scripsit:
>> Included are patches for OpenSSL 0.9.8j
>
> [...]
>
>> diff -u -p a/crypto/dso/dso_lib.c b/crypto/dso/dso_lib.c
>> --- a/crypto/dso/dso_lib.c 2003-12-27 15:40:08.0 +0100
>> +++ b/crypto/dso/dso_lib.c 2
Hi Benjamin:
It sounds to me like you'd probably have better luck adding to the TLS
protocol by taking this discussion to the IETF TLS working group.
While there are a number of protocol experts on this list, I think that
your idea would get more of a workout on the list where the people that
sta
Hi.
Attached patch fixes broken OPENSSL_NO_FP_API macro support in
openssl/crypto/pem/pem.h by adding missing alternatives for several
macros in case of a NO_FP_API build.
Detected with OpenSSL 0.9.8j. Older versions have not been checked
but the same fix is needed in the current CVS
Jurko Gospodnetić wrote:
Or is it just that the list is moderated and no moderators have yet
gotten to looking over my report?
Yes, it is moderated.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Devel
Jurko Gospodnetić wrote:
Hi all.
Just wandering whether there is something I am missing about posting
bug reports/patches to 'r...@openssl.org'. I send a report there three
days ago and got neither any confirmation nor did the report get
forwarded to the development list. I resent the sam
Hi.
It is moderated and I just did not find time to work through the
moderation queue from Friday evening till now.
Cool. Thank you for the explanation, and sorry for the noise.
And on a related note - I have questions related to your patch
submission system.
* How soon do such sim
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009, Jurko Gospodneti? wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> It is moderated and I just did not find time to work through the
>> moderation queue from Friday evening till now.
>
> Cool. Thank you for the explanation, and sorry for the noise.
>
> And on a related note - I have questions related
Hi.
It all depends on the nature of the patches. If they are likely to be portable
and relatively simple and not controversial they can be applied straight away.
Great to hear!
Otherwise they may need to be modified and/or discussed further.
To save possible duplicated effort I'd sugge
15 matches
Mail list logo
