Dear all,
please find attached in in-lined an updated version of the patch
for the path MTU detection.
The library stores the maximum DTLS packet size and converts to
that when using the example programs which run only over IPv4
and UDP.
On Linux the path MTU infrastructure is used, which is
On May 16, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009, Michael Txen wrote:
Dear all,
we will revise this patch on Monday. Please do not commit.
I need to play with the IP_MTU option on a Linux system
and have a discussion with Robin.
It has already been committed
[tue...@fh-muenster.de - Sun May 17 11:14:33 2009]:
Dear all,
please find attached in in-lined an updated version of the patch
for the path MTU detection.
Please don't send patches inline. Some mail agents line wrap and this
corrupts the patch as it has done in this case. Sending as a
On May 17, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
[tue...@fh-muenster.de - Sun May 17 11:14:33 2009]:
Dear all,
please find attached in in-lined an updated version of the patch
for the path MTU detection.
Please don't send patches inline. Some mail agents line wrap and this
See ongoing discussion regarding DTLS: this is something that should
be adjusted in the next CVS, if I read Mr. Henson's messages
correctly. DTLS is in progress, so expect some issues in the near
future: snapshots are a, after all, only snaps of the development
process at work.)
Take care,
Ger
Ooops, missed the attachment. Patch now applied to 1.0.0-beta and HEAD.
A modified version was applied to 0.9.8, please check that is OK.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development
[steve - Sat May 16 18:28:06 2009]:
Patch applied to 1.0, HEAD and 0.9.8. Thanks for the report.
Patch reverted on 0.9.8, it breaks compilation. Please supply a version
for 0.9.8.
__
OpenSSL Project
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 07:16:47PM +0200, Ger Hobbelt wrote:
See ongoing discussion regarding DTLS: this is something that should
be adjusted in the next CVS, if I read Mr. Henson's messages
correctly. DTLS is in progress, so expect some issues in the near
future: snapshots are a, after all,
Sorry about the delayed response. Travel.
From: Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org
sms WIMP $ write sys$output f$getsyi( VERSION)
sms V5.4
sms WIMP $ write sys$output f$getsyi( HW_MODEL)
sms 49
Hmmm, maybe I'm wrong then... It's odd, because back when I decided
to use f$getsyi(CPU),
