16.11.2010 14:45, Dr. Stephen Henson пишет:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010, Valery Blazhnov wrote:
15.11.2010 19:55, Dr. Stephen Henson ??:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Valery Blazhnov wrote:
I need an advice on usind EVP_SignFinal function with two private key
objects stored on two different
source code modifications?
Valery Blazhnov
LISSI ltd.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
15.11.2010 19:55, Dr. Stephen Henson пишет:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Valery Blazhnov wrote:
I need an advice on usind EVP_SignFinal function with two private key
objects stored on two different tokens. I can use two PKCS11 engine
instances to access these objects in low-level functions
This command works with ccgost engine:
openssl dgst -mac gost-mac -binary -macopt
hexkey:3132333435363738393031323334353637383930313233343536373839303132
-out mac.bin data.bin
10.11.2010 2:07, Andrey Kulikov пишет:
Hello,
I've got a problem with calculating gost-mac using Openssl 1.0.0a
You are right, sorry. The reference error is indirectly caused by my
own changes. Thank you for your help.
Valery Blazhnov
03.11.2010 15:20, Dr. Stephen Henson пишет:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010, Valery Blazhnov wrote:
Yes, but EVP_PKEY_CTX_new() may be called and is really called sometimes
Where can I get program example using ENGINE as STORE?
Valery Blazhnov
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated
default
digest:.\crypto\evp\m_sigver.c:84
That command worked well with OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta 4 and 5. What is wrong now?
Valery Blazhnov
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development
)
memcpy(out-md_data,in-md_data,out-digest-ctx_size);
Valery Blazhnov
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Dr. Stephen Henson пишет:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010, Valery Blazhnov wrote:
It seems to me that direct memory copying in crypto/evp/digest.c:
EVP_MD_CTX_copy_ex() may conflct with internal engine implementation. IMHO
it would be better to perform that direct memory copying only
