-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erwann ABALEA
Sent: 18 April 2002 17:02
To: xavier de CD and LP
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem OpenSA SSL
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, xavier de CD and LP wrote:
> I don't know if this a bug but I ad
I didn't send but what it seems to do is extract emails.. it's like a trojan
horse macro
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 10:32 AM
Subject: Failed to clean virus file LINKS.VBS
> The file you have sent was infected with a virus but InterScan E
hi,
We have ssl (VERSION=0.9.7-dev) in the OpenBSD-CURRENT.
Now we dig the problem in ${PORTS}/comms/kermit.
cc -O2 -DBSD44 -DCK_CURSES -DCK_NEWTERM -DTCPSOCKET -DOPENBSD
-DUSE_UU_LOCK -DFNFLOAT -DUSE_STRERROR -DCKHTTP -DCK_SSL
-DCK_AUTHENTICATION -DCK_ENCRYPTION -DCK_DES -DKTARGET=\"openbs
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:10:58PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
>
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jun 5 14:48:52 2002]:
>
> > ck_ssl.c: In function k_tn_tls_negotiate':
> > ck_ssl.c:3232: ID_uniqueIdentifier' undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > ck_ssl.c:3232: (Each undeclared ide
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:46:28AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
> > For instance, mod_ssl 2.8.8-1.3.24 use workaround:
> > #ifndef NID_uniqueIdentifier
> > #define NID_uniqueIdentifier 102
> > #endif
>
> I don't like this option. As it is now, the new (correct)
> NID_uniqueIden
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:46:28AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
> > Also, markus@ created this temp patch:
> > +@@ -102,6 +104,13 @@
> > + !ERROR This module requires OpenSSL 0.9.5a or higher
> > + #endif /* OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER */
> > + #endif /* SSLDLL */
> > ++
> > ++#if OPENSSL_VERSIO
fic function in t1_enc.c is inconsistent
with the current way that the internals of openssl are encapsulated. Is there
a better way?
Views?
--
Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open System Consultants Pty. LtdUnix, Perl, Motif, C++, WWW
24 Bateman St Hampton,
In light of the recent vulnerabilities announced in openssl, I am attempting
to recompile packages against openssl-0.9.6e. Finding binaries/libraries
compiled against shared libraries has been straightforward. However, I
have no clue how to approach finding binaries/libraries that have
stati
ut, should this be a supported set of includes?
mrc
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features
L_PREFIX)$(INSTALLTOP)/lib/pkgconfig
+ chmod 755 $(INSTALL_PREFIX)$(INSTALLTOP)/lib/pkgconfig
install_docs:
@$(PERL) $(TOP)/util/mkdir-p.pl \
EOF
--
Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
Hi James,
Here's a link to a VC++ project from
the OpenSSL site to exactly what you're looking for. The instructions are
in the tarball.
http://www.iconsinc.com/~agray/ossldev/097/
(you want VC6ossl097.tar.gz )
-Mike Gagnon
- Original Message -
From:
J
ed or broken by these patches
What else do you need before rolling these patches in?
http://www.open.com.au/radiator/free-downloads/openssl-0.9.9-session-ticket.patch
Cheers.
On Wednesday 29 August 2007 17:11, Mike McCauley wrote:
> Hello dev team.
>
> Jouni Malinen recently posted here wit
i was flipping through the tracker when i noticed #1342
(bug/gentoo/bashdb/stdin) ... this isnt an openssl by any means so the ticket
can simply be punted
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
dont know `7z`
3781438 openssl-SNAP-20080105.tar.gz
2495545 openssl-SNAP-20080105.tar.lzma
2484981 openssl-SNAP-20080105.7z
looks to me like tar+lzma is the way to go, not 7z
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
compresses once while everyone else decompresses many many times.
a few more data points from glancing at wikipedia ... Inno Setup, NSIS, and
RPM include lzma in the latest releases
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
st CRL for an
issuer.
Cheers.
--
Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open System Consultants Pty. LtdUnix, Perl, Motif, C++, WWW
9 Bulbul Place Currumbin Waters QLD 4223 Australia http://www.open.com.au
Phone +61 7 5598-7474 Fax
There are pre-compiled supported versions of openssl 0.9.8h for 11.11 at:
http://h20293.www2.hp.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductInfo.do?productNumber=OPENSSL11I
These depots include the source and instructions on how to make openssl on
HP-UX if you need to.
-Mike
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
ve a fix for this problem, or at least have the patch applied?
Cheers.
--
Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open System Consultants Pty. Ltd
9 Bulbul Place Currumbin Waters QLD 4223 Australia http://www.open.com.au
Phone +61 7 5598-7474 Fax +6
t; wpa_supplicant/hostapd 0.6.x for EAP-FAST.
Thanks Jouni. Net::SSLeay perl module has been updated in SVN to match the new
defines and code.
Cheers.
--
Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open System Consultants Pty. Ltd
9 Bulbul Place Currumbin Waters QLD 4223
if you want to build your own binaries.
Later this month there will be precompiled binary versions of OpenSSL for
0.9.7m/0.9.8j including FIPS 1.1.2/1.2
Regards,
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org] On
Behalf Of Bhanu P
> OpenSSL 1.0.0 instead does:
>
> if expr "$MAKEDEPEND" : '.*gcc$' > /dev/null; then
>
> i.e. check if $MAKEDEPEND ends in "gcc". Would backporting that test
> address your concerns?
for all the use cases i care about, it should indeed work fine
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
t.c.~1.4.2.13.~
openssl-0.9.8l/ssl/s3_lib.c.~1.74.2.23.~
openssl-0.9.8l/ssl/s3_pkt.c.~1.57.2.4.~
openssl-0.9.8l/ssl/s3_srvr.c.orig
openssl-0.9.8l/ssl/ssl.h.orig
openssl-0.9.8l/ssl/ssl3.h.~1.30.2.5.~
openssl-0.9.8l/ssl/ssl_err.c.orig
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
The openssl command is used for a lot of things.
Usually I work in a Unix environment but you and see a man page for
openssl ( or any other ssl call )
http://h30097.www3.hp.com/docs/base_doc/DOCUMENTATION/V51B_HTML/MAN/INDEXES/INDEX_O.HTM
Thanks,
Mike
Hi All,
I use configure to setup the Makefile for vxworks
ppc860. And have following errors when I ran make. Do
anyone know the reason?
Thanks in advance,
Mike
make[11]: Entering directory
`/vobs/optera/target/src/usr/optera/mgmtInterface/common/security/src/ssl/fips/sha1'
ccppc -I
all
these issues for us on Gentoo
-mike
Index: Configure
===
RCS file: /usr/local/src/openssl/cvs-tree/openssl/Configure,v
retrieving revision 1.453
diff -u -r1.453 Configure
--- Configure 9 Dec 2004 15:39:53 - 1.453
+++ Configure 13 D
tried to build openssl on a big endian arm box and ... well needless to say it
didnt work so nicely :)
find attached a patch (against cvs version, not 0.9.7e) i used to fix the
problem in Gentoo
-mike
Index: Configure
===
RCS file
tried to build openssl on a big endian arm box and ... well needless to say it
didnt work so nicely :)
find attached a patch (against cvs version, not 0.9.7e) i used to fix the
problem in Gentoo
-mike
Index: Configure
===
RCS file
all
these issues for us on Gentoo
-mike
Index: Configure
===
RCS file: /usr/local/src/openssl/cvs-tree/openssl/Configure,v
retrieving revision 1.453
diff -u -r1.453 Configure
--- Configure 9 Dec 2004 15:39:53 - 1.453
+++ Configure 13 D
).
i posted some fixes a while ago for 0.9.7e which were accepted and are in
0.9.7g ... openssl configured all arm targets as little endian which is why
it was failing
-mike
__
OpenSSL Project
On Thursday 26 May 2005 08:43 am, vijay basav wrote:
> in Configure file chnge DL_ENDIAN(little endian) to DB_ENDIAN(big endian)
> and EL to EB
the Configure script in the latest 0.9.7 version (i.e. g) does not set ENDIAN
for arm targets ... it's been moved to the config s
people had in upgrading from 0.9.7e to 0.9.7[fg] on x86_64 linux
-mike
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
he full version of the
library ... when you go to link with -lcrypto, the libname
'libcrypto.so.0.9.7' is recorded in the NEEDED section of the elf instead of
'libcrypto.so.0' ... so unless you have 0.9.8 install its library as
'li
pretty sure that's a system issue and unrelated
to openssl ;)
-mike
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl
I think I've found a bug in BN_sub_word. It appears
that it is not correctly setting the sign of the
resulting BIGNUM. The following program attempts to
create a BIGNUM with a value of -70, but it instead
ends up with value 70.
$ ./BNTest
Zero: 0
-70: 70
Mike
#include
#include
int
Sorry I forgot to mention that this is with version
0.9.8 on Windows XP (mingw).
Mike
I wrote:
I think I've found a bug in BN_sub_word. It appears
that it is not correctly setting the sign of the
resulting BIGNUM. The following program attempts to
create a BIGNUM with a value of -70, b
to the ASN1_item_ex_d2i function. It is well
beyond my knowledge of the internal workings of
openssl, so I couldn't figure out how to modify
the function to handle the condition of len==0.
This no longer affects me, but I thought I'd pass
along my experie
standard" tool like bzip2?
>
> Now you're asking the right question.
>
> openssl.org should consider offering sources in bzip2 format.
yeah, i love when people provide .tar.bz2 archives along with .tar.gz
-mike
___
to cross-compile for
arm all the time
-mike
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
On Thursday 06 October 2005 01:44 pm, Anil Gunturu wrote:
> Looks like latest openssl-0.9.8 doesn't have it
this is why more details is better :p
with 0.9.8, a lot of the linux targets were consolidated ... so try running:
./Configure linux-generic32 -DL_ENDIAN .
builds though (but maybe the script isnt used for
non-ELF targets so thats OK?)
-mike
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
6nasm.pl need to be fixed too ? in theory, if it was used to
generate some source files which are included in the final lib, it'll force
back in exec stack markings ...
%ifidn __OUTPUT_FORMAT__,elf
section .note.GNU-stack noalloc noexec nowri
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 03:21:20PM +0100, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 November 2005 15:15, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> > btw, does x86nasm.pl need to be fixed too ? in theory, if it was used to
> > generate some source files which are included in the final lib, it&#x
anyway. My vote goes to alternative method, which can be deployed as
> easily as './config -Wa,--noexecstack' prior make.
or maybe add it to the default configure code as a normal check ? i'm pretty
sure there is no case where
On Friday 13 January 2006 01:48, Lee Thompson wrote:
> I'd be interested in your thoughts on this approach.
well your hardcoding of "-Wl,-R/opt/assembly/lib" in the linux-elf-rpath line
certainly wont work ...
-mike
On Friday 13 January 2006 11:38, Lee Thompson wrote:
> The code certainly runs so is your issue a point of
> coding style?
just because the path is correct on your machine has no relevance to anyone
else, and forcing people to install into "/opt/assembly/lib"
ather than just the path ...
--with-rpath=-Wl,-R/booga
elsif (/^--with-rpath=-(.*)$/)
$sldflags.=$1." ";
--with-rpath=/booga
elsif (/^--with-rpath=(.*)$/)
$sldflags.=-Wl,-R$1." ";
--with-rpath
elsif (/^--with-rpath$/)
$sldflags.="-Wl,-R$prefix/lib ";
-m
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 11:26, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> Some of the new ts/ files are too long for a 8+3 filesystem.
a ton of files are too long for 8+3 filesystem in the openssl tarball
-mike
__
OpenSSL Proj
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 06:04, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> "Mike Frysinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 February 2006 11:26, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> >> Some of the new ts/ files are too long for a 8+3 filesystem.
> >
> > a ton of files
this patch adds an #include line to pod files that document API but dont
mention the header file where you can find the documented functions
also, i indented a few files as the standard seems to be to have one leading
space with prototypes
-mike
--- doc/crypto/ASN1_generate_nconf.pod
+++ doc
it's nice when a build system respects the env settings of CC/AR/RANLIB so
here's a minor patch to Configure to do just that
-mike
--- Configure
+++ Configure
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@
print "IsMK1MF=$IsMK1MF\n";
my @fields = split(/\s*:\s*/,$table{$target} . ":"
BSD license a long time ago
-mike
pgpFQ5AHB4lUP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 18:10, James Jones wrote:
> Is anyone aware that digium is using openssl in there g729 codec code
> and license registration with it display the openssl copyright info.
what's your po
Using openssl 0.9.7 (can't upgrade - can't test newer versions)
openssl dgst won't list its options easily, except like this:
openssl dgst -help
unknown option '-help'
options are
-c to output the digest with separating colons
-d to output debug info
-hexoutpu
you might want to "fix" buffer.h as well then ... i modeled the sha.h patch
after that file
-mike
pgpQ7USfqzipt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
--
Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open System Consultants Pty. LtdUnix, Perl, Motif, C++, WWW
9 Bulbul Place Currumbin Waters QLD 4223 Australia http://www.open.com.au
Phone +61 7 5598-7474 Fax +61 7 5598-7070
Radiator: the most
it works (or some other
> issues are addressed), I'll propagate it to 1.0.
it seems to work OK. i just built openssh against it and connected to a few
systems. this segfaulted before, but latest HEAD runs OK.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
nst 0.9.8o in attach.
Comments? Objections?
Mike
md_rand.c.patch
Description: Binary data
Nothing serious, having fun.
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Richard Levitte wrote:
> In message
> on Fri, 8 Oct 2010 16:30:22 +0300, Mike Pechkin
> said:
>
> mike.pechkin> I see the different ways how CRYPTO_w_lock used in md_rand.c
> mike.pechkin> Patch
y that goes a bit further. see attached.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
TLS v1.2 and TLS v1.1.
> o Preliminary FIPS capability for unvalidated 2.0 FIPS module.
> o SRP support.
i don't see mention of ABI compat changes, and it seems to not be compatible.
did someone forget to update the version string in crypto/opensslv.h ? it
still says
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
> > >OpenSSL version 1.0.1 released
> > >===
> > >
> &
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:36:09 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 14 Mar
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 17:18:19 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:30:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 14 Mar
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 19:23:14 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i'm not looking for downstream workarounds here but rather the right
> > answer. is openssl-1.0.1 expected to be ABI compatible with
> > openssl-1.0.0 ?
>
&
On Thursday 15 March 2012 03:19:07 Ludwig Nussel wrote:
> Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> i'm not looking for downstream workarounds here but rather the right
> >> answer. is openssl-1.0.1 expected to be ABI co
ally patch OpenSSL for this every
> release.
it'd be nice if the patch was merged
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2051
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
en kind of bad, so i lose incentive to fix keep posting
patches.
the other thing you should do is to run:
make -j1 depend
make -jN
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 19 June 2013 07:21:39 Ben Laurie wrote:
> On 18 June 2013 22:35, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 June 2013 07:37:55 Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> While building openssl-1.0.1e I noticed that the parallel build
> >> is broken.
> >
> > y
On Saturday 22 June 2013 15:07:49 Ben Laurie wrote:
> On 22 June 2013 19:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 June 2013 07:21:39 Ben Laurie wrote:
> >> On 18 June 2013 22:35, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 18 June 2013 07:37:55 Richard Weinberger
Lingyun -
We have a script which builds eight
versions/permutations of OpenSSL and an old version of
SSLeay and installs each in its own directory under
the $HOME/local directory (e.g.
$HOME/local/openssl-0.9.4.bsafe, or
$HOME/local/openssl-0.9.1c).
we use the following code : (assume
VERSION=op
Hello,
I am hoping someone can point me in the correct direction, I had no idea so
many people were using this open source SSL version until I signed up for
the list = )
I am trying to implement a simple HTTP client with HTTPS functionality and
am wondering if anyone can point out a reference on
.
Mike Dever
President
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: If you prefer not to receive these occasional alerts regarding the availability of your
Web site, reply to this email with Cancel in the subject line. Please leave a full copy of
this message in the body of your reply
here to learn more about InternetSeer.
Mike Dever
President
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note: If you prefer not to receive these occasional alerts regarding the availability of your
Web site, reply to this email with Cancel in the subject line. Please leave a full copy of
this
I just hacked this together last night:
https://mercury.itsprojects.com/~mike/WebPlatform-OpenSSL-0.9.2b-3.src.rpm
There may be some crusty stuff in it - I'm learning RPM as I go. Also, the
namespace I put it under will offend most RedHat purists, but I'm
integrating something for my
don't, I'm open to suggestions on changing that, just don't come at me
with huge expectations. I react much better to patches and or specific
suggestions than "this is broke, why doesn't it work?".
I should also
= 7AE65280 PC = PS = 001B
VAX2::[ssl.openssl-0_9_4] openssl version -a
%DCL-E-OPENIN, error opening -A as input
-RMS-F-SYN, file specification syntax error
With best regards,
Mike
* Mike Xun
are you trying to install as "root" or as a lesser account?
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnold Schoenberg
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 10:53 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Cc: Shuping Ye; Mike Testa
> Subject: openssl installati
Hi,
I have tested smime tools of new openssl 0.9.5 beta1.
Sign only and Sign&Encrypt is OK, but Encrypt Only have a minor problem.
I sent the encrypted mail to my netscape4.7 mail client , I got a
encrypted mail correctly, but the content of the mail is added one line
"Content-Type: text/plain"
_GNUC__) && __GNUC__>=2
__attribute__((constructor))
#endif
void OPENSSL_cpuid_setup(void)
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
piler feature, it's a C library feature
that said, a simple check for the sys/auxv.h header is sufficient. if openssl
even has the build tooling to support headers like that.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
LIBC_PREREQ is not defined, preprocessor will error out. So, it
> should be either
>
> #if defined(__GLIBC__) && ((__GLIBC__<<16) | __GLIBC_MINOR__) >= ((2<<16) |
> 16)
or nest the ifdefs
#ifdef __GLIBC_PREREQ
# if __GLIBC_PREREQ(...)
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
at the "right" path is for the
active toolchain tends to be fragile and toolchain specific. that's quite a
lot of junk code for no real gain.
if you want to install into lib64, then pass --libdir=lib64.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
nd should work on all platforms. It's just
> that you can't making everything that isn't public static.
i think these patches are complementary. mark everything static where
possible, and additionally mark everything hidden.
but i guess hopes of getting these merged are a
I've prepared a proof-of-concept unit/regression test for the Heartbleed
bug that I've posted at: http://goo.gl/wTYD9K
If folks are interested, I can prepare an official patch to add it to
OpenSSL.
Thanks,
Mike
mbl...@acm.org
Unit test for the TLS heartbeat code; acts as a regression test against
CVE-2014-0160.
Thanks,
Mike
heartbeat_test.patch
Description: Binary data
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
> 6. Write new tests
>
> Our test suite sucks. More tests is better.
>
Shall I send a pull request for this:
https://github.com/mbland/openssl/commit/a7a9e18b550edf059dfd54683ac1f45170ff9fb2
Mike
Oh, absolutely I've verified it. :-)
I'll get that turned around to you shortly.
Mike
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
> On 24 April 2014 18:44, Mike Bland wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
> >>
> >> 6. Wri
oving the rpath.
yeah, in most systems it's pointless. guess it should be made into a
configure flag if people want to continue supporting it.
-mike
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
D
being broken to the detriment of correct
working build systems makes no sense.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
formation already found in libssl.pc and
libcrypto.pc. even if people want to keep -lcrypto in libssl.pc (even
though it makes no sense), that second hunk in my patch changes
nothing from the end user's point of view -- it just cleans up the
internals of the generated pkg-config files.
-mike
think you're on the right mailing list. :)
-Mike
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Daniel Hamacher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am reading the mailing list for a week now and I would like to
> contribute in the near future. I can only imagine how complex this project
> might be, so I am lo
Just opened https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/110 with a fix.
Mike
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hey guys!
>
> Since commit 6af080acaf ("Unit/regression test for TLS heartbeats."),
> when compiling master/OpenSSL_1_0_2-stable/Ope
ole address this one particular issue, and to maximize the impact of
my contributions.
Happy to hear people's thoughts on this. If the uptake is positive, I
can help organize the effort to get things moving soon.
Thanks,
Mike
I could manage it via Google Groups,
rather than create more majordomo work for the core team. Thoughts?
Thanks,
Mike
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
ersion/branch or platform? Steve Henson submitted a fix to
#ifdef out the test on Windows for now to avoid this exact problem.
(We'll look into a longer-term solution as part of the testing effort;
I haven't access to a Windows machine at the moment.)
Mike
lunteering
to help add some of this valgrind support?
Mike
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Reini Urban wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 04:58 PM, Mike Bland wrote:
>>
>> Thanks to a few brave volunteers and the support of the core OpenSSL
>> team, it looks like we can begin moving on
to BUILDENV? Thoughts? Or
> am I missing something?
maybe. i find it really hard to understand what the Makefiles are going for
in general, so i don't try to start at them too hard.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__func__ is defined in C99. What version of the SGI C compiler are you
using? According to the following, as of version 7.4, the -c99 flag
should enable this to compile:
http://www.sgi.com/products/software/irix/tools/c.html
Mike
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Pieter Bowman via RT wrote
On Fri 06 Jun 2014 09:15:09 Kurt Roeckx via RT wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 01:27:02AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thu 05 Jun 2014 22:53:32 Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
> > > On Sun Apr 27 13:04:20 2014, vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
> > > > It's a standa
er OpenSSL repository.
Thanks to everyone whose interest and support is helping to make this happen,
Mike
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@o
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
