--On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 12:01 AM +0100 Kurt Roeckx via RT
r...@openssl.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:09:18PM +0100, Salz, Rich via RT wrote:
The short answer is that nobody has come up with comprehensive
cross-platform IPv6 support. Fixing the apps isn't enough; how does a
--On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 12:01 AM +0100 Kurt Roeckx via RT
r...@openssl.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:09:18PM +0100, Salz, Rich via RT wrote:
The short answer is that nobody has come up with comprehensive
cross-platform IPv6 support. Fixing the apps isn't enough; how does a
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:09:18PM +0100, Salz, Rich via RT wrote:
The short answer is that nobody has come up with comprehensive cross-platform
IPv6 support. Fixing the apps isn't enough; how does a server listen on
IPv4, v6, both -- and make it work on our supported platforms? What should
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:09:18PM +0100, Salz, Rich via RT wrote:
The short answer is that nobody has come up with comprehensive cross-platform
IPv6 support. Fixing the apps isn't enough; how does a server listen on
IPv4, v6, both -- and make it work on our supported platforms? What should
I was unaware of 2501. But that’s fine by me… however, why hasn’t 2051 been
applied to the code?
--
-Todd Short
// tsh...@akamai.commailto:tsh...@akamai.com
// “One if by land, two if by sea, three if by the Internet.
On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 9:29 PM + Short, Todd
tsh...@akamai.com wrote:
I was unaware of 2501. But that's fine by me… however, why hasn't
2051 been applied to the code?
People have been asking this question for years.
https://lwn.net/Articles/486369/
--On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 9:29 PM + Short, Todd
tsh...@akamai.com wrote:
I was unaware of 2501. But that's fine by me… however, why hasn't
2051 been applied to the code?
People have been asking this question for years.
https://lwn.net/Articles/486369/
--On Tuesday, March 03, 2015 3:15 PM -0600 Short, Todd
tsh...@akamai.com wrote:
The previous patch file had two bugs due to a swapped argument and the
formatting changes (missing braces).
The attached is an updated patch.
Why did you open a new RT when
I was unaware of 2501. But that’s fine by me… however, why hasn’t 2051 been
applied to the code?
--
-Todd Short
// tsh...@akamai.commailto:tsh...@akamai.com
// “One if by land, two if by sea, three if by the Internet.
On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Tuesday, March 03, 2015 3:15 PM -0600 Short, Todd
tsh...@akamai.com wrote:
The previous patch file had two bugs due to a swapped argument and the
formatting changes (missing braces).
The attached is an updated patch.
Why did you open a new RT when
The short answer is that nobody has come up with comprehensive cross-platform
IPv6 support. Fixing the apps isn't enough; how does a server listen on IPv4,
v6, both -- and make it work on our supported platforms? What should the
various BIO API's do?
Looking forward to diff's.
The previous patch file had two bugs due to a swapped argument and the
formatting changes (missing braces).
The attached is an updated patch.
0001-Provides-IPv6-support-in-s_client-s_server-Patch-ipv.patch
Description: 0001-Provides-IPv6-support-in-s_client-s_server-Patch-ipv.patch
---Todd
Hello OpenSSL Org:
This is a change that Akamai has made to it’s implementation of OpenSSL.
Version: master branch
Description: Adds IPv6 support in s_client/s_server
This adds two options, -4 and -6, to specify the address family to connect
with. In addition, the address field on the command
13 matches
Mail list logo
