Ok, I have finally changed the gcc-recognition in config to use the
-dumpversion flag.
Case closed :-)
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing Lis
I agree that simply using -dumpversion makes more sense, on the
assumption that it will always only output the number.
"--version" appears to be intended to be human-readable, not
machine-readable, and its format may change at any time, as it
just did. Why keep adding sed commands that say, "oh,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:14:43 +0200
(METDST), "Lutz Jaenicke via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> Richard: you seem to have a beta version of 3.1.1 around. Will its
rt> output for -dumpversion somehow fit into the model?
: ; gcc -dumpversion
3.1.1
I see no pro
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:14:43 +0200
(METDST), "Lutz Jaenicke via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> Richard: you seem to have a beta version of 3.1.1 around. Will its
rt> output for -dumpversion somehow fit into the model?
: ; gcc -dumpversion
3.1.1
I see no prob
I agree that simply using -dumpversion makes more sense, on the
assumption that it will always only output the number.
"--version" appears to be intended to be human-readable, not
machine-readable, and its format may change at any time, as it
just did. Why keep adding sed commands that say, "oh,
Different solutions have been proposed and I am not sure whether the
currently checked in version will finally work.
I am not sure for how long -dumpversion was supported (at least since
1994 as was reported) and I strongly consider to use -dumpversion.
Richard: you seem to have a beta version
Richard-
Strange. I guess it's time to compare what we're looking at.
I'm running on a Sun Ultra-60 w/ SunOS 5.8.
I downloaded openssl-0.9.6d.tar.gz from http://www.openssl.org/source/.
I then ran the following command:
./config --prefix=/usr/local/openssl-0.9.6d \
--op
Richard-
Strange. I guess it's time to compare what we're looking at.
I'm running on a Sun Ultra-60 w/ SunOS 5.8.
I downloaded openssl-0.9.6d.tar.gz from http://www.openssl.org/source/.
I then ran the following command:
./config --prefix=/usr/local/openssl-0.9.6d \
--o
I'm afraid this was not a fix. Have you tried it with gcc-3.1?
I encountered this problem with the 0.9.6d snapshot.
The output of "gcc --version" with gcc version 3.1 is this
(not including the lines of hyphens):
gcc (GCC) 3.1
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:52:11 -0700,
Allen Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
allenh> I'm afraid this was not a fix. Have you tried it with gcc-3.1?
allenh> I encountered this problem with the 0.9.6d snapshot.
I tried it just now, GCCVER becamse 31, and my output
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:52:11 -0700,
Allen Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
allenh> I'm afraid this was not a fix. Have you tried it with gcc-3.1?
allenh> I encountered this problem with the 0.9.6d snapshot.
I tried it just now, GCCVER becamse 31, and my output w
I'm afraid this was not a fix. Have you tried it with gcc-3.1?
I encountered this problem with the 0.9.6d snapshot.
The output of "gcc --version" with gcc version 3.1 is this
(not including the lines of hyphens):
gcc (GCC) 3.1
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This
I went for a different solution. Since the problem was the sed that
takes away all the crap before the version number, I changed it to
have the dash be part of the character set to remove instead of
having it as a mandatory character after said set. That should
resolve this ticket. Reopen
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
>
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 13 08:34:54 2002]:
>
> > The "config" script needs to use "gcc -dumpversion"
> > instead of "gcc --version" to determine the gcc version.
> > gcc-3.1 outputs a bunch of text with "--version", but
> > just the number
|
| cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| Subject: [openssl.org #96] bug in config script (gcc 3.1)
|
>-|
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| Subject: [openssl.org #96] bug in config script (gcc 3.1)
|
>-|
[[EMAIL PROTECTE
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 13 08:34:54 2002]:
> The "config" script needs to use "gcc -dumpversion"
> instead of "gcc --version" to determine the gcc version.
> gcc-3.1 outputs a bunch of text with "--version", but
> just the number with "-dumpversion", which also works for
> gcc-2.95.
Sounds
17 matches
Mail list logo
