In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 1 Jun 2005 14:03:06 -0700 (PDT), Doug
Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dkaufman> You are quite correct, in that quoting DEVRANDOM was the wrong thing
dkaufman> to do. It put the string "DEVRANDOM" into the library instead of the
dkaufman> value of DEVRANDOM
The latter proposed change, quoting DEVRANDOM, shall have adverse effect
on other platforms. Can you elaborate on the error during compilation
instead? As for mtu and sock_type. Is it possible to resolve it by
I think I have finally found the proper fix, however. This patch is
against openssl
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2005, Andy Polyakov wrote:
>
> > The latter proposed change, quoting DEVRANDOM, shall have adverse effect
> > on other platforms. Can you elaborate on the error during compilation
> > instead? As for mtu and sock_type. Is it possible to
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> > The beta 2 of 0.9.8 requires a small patch to compile with DJGPP under
> > DOS. "mtu" and "sock_type" are defined by headers from the WATT-32
> > library and need to be undefined. The backslash in the definition of
> > DEVRANDOM (encoding the "$") also
The beta 2 of 0.9.8 requires a small patch to compile with DJGPP under
DOS. "mtu" and "sock_type" are defined by headers from the WATT-32
library and need to be undefined. The backslash in the definition of
DEVRANDOM (encoding the "$") also causes an error when compiling. I
don't think that these
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> OpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta 2
>
>
> OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
> http://www.openssl.org/
>
> OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The second beta is now
> released. The be
