-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 3
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The second beta is now released.
The beta release is available for d
On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:57 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Please download and test them as soon as possible. This new OpenSSL
Mac OS X 10.5.7 on Intel.
./Configure --prefix=/UserData/asf/openssl-1.0.0b3 shared threads zlib-
dynamic darwin64-x86_64-cc
Builds fine, but tests fail on incorrec
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009, Sander Temme wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:57 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>
>> Please download and test them as soon as possible. This new OpenSSL
>
>
> Mac OS X 10.5.7 on Intel.
>
> ./Configure --prefix=/UserData/asf/openssl-1.0.0b3 shared threads
> zlib-dynamic darwi
On Jul 15, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Try the next snapshot or this patch:
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=18416
Thanks for the report,
That does the trick with a little further massaging. Revised patch:
[scte...@legadema] tmp $ diff -u openssl-1.0.0-beta3/crypto/dso/
Shouldn't DSO_ext be 6 if OPENSSL_SYS_MACOSX is defined?
Best regards
Michael
On Jul 16, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Jul 15, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Try the next snapshot or this patch:
http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=18416
Thanks for the report,
Th
On Jul 15, 2009, at 11:44 PM, Michael Tüxen wrote:
Shouldn't DSO_ext be 6 if OPENSSL_SYS_MACOSX is defined?
Totally. I spaced on that, but see in the commit messages that Dr.
Henson caught it.
S.
Best regards
Michael
On Jul 16, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Jul 15, 2009,
HI Steve,
Dr. Stephen Henson schrieb:
>
> OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 3
>
>
> OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
> http://www.openssl.org/
>
> OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The second beta is now released.
> The beta release is avail
Hi,
in addition to the issue below I see another one when I try to build
with ASM support: although the *.asm files get generated, the mk1mf.pl
script seems no longer to put the asm objects nor the asm build rules
into the generated makefile ...
I've looked though the mk1mf.pl, but lost track someh
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009, Guenter wrote:
> Hi,
> in addition to the issue below I see another one when I try to build
> with ASM support: although the *.asm files get generated, the mk1mf.pl
> script seems no longer to put the asm objects nor the asm build rules
> into the generated makefile ...
> I'v
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009, Guenter wrote:
> HI Steve,
>
> Dr. Stephen Henson schrieb:
> >
> > OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 3
> >
> >
> > OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
> > http://www.openssl.org/
> >
> > OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. Th
Hi Steve,
Dr. Stephen Henson schrieb:
> Does adding Netware to the OPENSSL_SYS_BEOS_BONE part which #undefs AF_INET6
> in b_sock.c work or do you need additional cases?
yes, this works at first glance (cant tell more since I have finally a
linkage prob so cant test ATM); with below patch compilatio
Hi Steve,
Guenter schrieb:
> yes, this works at first glance (cant tell more since I have finally a
> linkage prob so cant test ATM); with below patch compilation finishes:
now to the linkage prob which seems the last one with the NetWare CLIB
platform: we have no gettimeofday() there, so we need a
From: "Dr. Stephen Henson"
> OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 3
The VMS build fails pretty quickly. The VMS builders seem to have
gained some of the changes I've suggested for 0.9.8k (like
$ ARCH = F$EDIT( F$GETSYI( "ARCH_NAME"), "UPCASE")
), but there's still a lot of junk (like, for ex
-Original Message-
From: Steven M. Schweda [mailto:s...@antinode.info]
Sent: den 15 juli 2009 21:48
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS
From: "Dr. Stephen Henson"
> OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 3
The VMS build fails pretty quickly. The VMS bui
Hi Steve,
Dr. Stephen Henson schrieb:
> Does adding Netware to the OPENSSL_SYS_BEOS_BONE part which #undefs AF_INET6
> in b_sock.c work or do you need additional cases?
yes, this works at first glance (cant tell more since I have finally a
linkage prob so cant test ATM); with below patch compilatio
in advance.
Regards
Zoltan Arpadffy
-Original Message-
From: Steven M. Schweda [mailto:s...@antinode.info]
Sent: den 15 juli 2009 21:48
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS
From: "Dr. Stephen Henson"
> OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 3
From: "Arpadffy Zoltan"
> As you probably know VMS has a different DIFF output than UNIX diff and
> is not able to produce patch output.
>
> Please advice, how can I share my changes.
>
> May I submit a standard VMS diff output here?
You might try GNU "diff" for VMS:
http://antinode.
From: "Arpadffy Zoltan"
> This patch corrects build on OpenVMS systems.
I haven't looked at it yet, but ...
> As VMS does not have a make clean function yet, it was hard to separate
> the really modified files from the copied (poor symlink imitation on
> VMS) etc.
Copied files? What's c
believe in tolerance and free
will's good choices.
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Steven M. Schweda [mailto:s...@antinode.info]
Sent: den 15 augusti 2009 18:39
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS
From: "Arpadffy Zoltan"
SSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS
In message <839c820b5c926b4b89713b3a6ed68d2aae4...@sgstmail.scigames.at>
on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:15:12 +0200, "Arpadffy Zoltan"
said:
Zoltan.Arpadffy> OPTIONAL TODO
Zoltan.Arpadffy> - in order to make life more compatible we could use
the same
clude
+ #endif
Should not be there - please ignore it.
Regards,
Z
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte [mailto:rich...@levitte.org]
Sent: den 17 augusti 2009 11:10
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; Arpadffy Zoltan
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS
In me
From: "Arpadffy Zoltan"
> As VMS does not have a make clean function yet, [...]
When _all_ the product files get put into architecture-specific
directories, then cleaning gets easy.
> > Copied files? What's copied? =20
> In makevms.com ALL target will do a SOFTLINKS by the way, that will do
(resend)
In message <09081709341183_20200...@antinode.info> on Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:34:11
-0500 (CDT), s...@antinode.info (Steven M. Schweda) said:
sms> From: "Arpadffy Zoltan"
sms>
sms> > As VMS does not have a make clean function yet, [...]
sms>
sms>When _all_ the product files get put i
Hello,
> I haven't had a VAX account for a long time... someone give me one
and I'll play...
You can create your own account at
http://www.polarhome.com/service/shell/
... and just drop me a mail informing me what is you username.
Regards,
Z
___
From: Richard Levitte
> sms>When _all_ the product files get put into architecture-specific
> sms> directories, then cleaning gets easy.
>
> Agreed, but except for cleaning purposes, is there a reason to put
> architecture-independent files in architecture-specific directories?
No, but i
Hello Richard,
>If those who do commit to the repository, I believe I'm the only one
>dealing with the VMS parts of the kit...
I tested OPENSSL-VMS_64BIT-SNAP-20090821 as I was expecting that my
changes would be there.
I was wrong :(
I wonder, where do you apply the patches and patch suggest
In message <839c820b5c926b4b89713b3a6ed68d2aae4...@sgstmail.scigames.at> on
Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:36:08 +0200, "Arpadffy Zoltan"
said:
Zoltan.Arpadffy>
Zoltan.Arpadffy>
Zoltan.Arpadffy> Hello Richard,
Zoltan.Arpadffy>
Zoltan.Arpadffy> >If those who do commit to the repository, I believe I'm th
: Richard Levitte [mailto:rich...@levitte.org]
Sent: den 25 augusti 2009 10:09
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; Arpadffy Zoltan
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS
In message <839c820b5c926b4b89713b3a6ed68d2aae4...@sgstmail.scigames.at>
on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:36:08 +0200, &qu
28 matches
Mail list logo
