Here is a revised patch for DOS (and other platforms that don't
support symbolic links). With this patch openssl-0.9.7 snapshot from
19 April 2002 compiles without problems. Make test show no errors,
except inability to load 'random state' (related to no built-in
method of gathering entropy). I al
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:09:18PM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> Here is a revised patch for DOS (and other platforms that don't
> support symbolic links). With this patch openssl-0.9.7 snapshot from
> 19 April 2002 compiles without problems. Make test show no errors,
> except inability to load 'ra
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:42:24
+0200, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
vinschen> I don't understand what this patch has to do with Cygwin since Cygwin
vinschen> supports symbolc links since years now. Could you explain, please?
Note that Doug's changes sh
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:53:06AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:42:24
>+0200, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> vinschen> I don't understand what this patch has to do with Cygwin since Cygwin
> vinschen> supports
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:42:24
>+0200, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> vinschen> I don't understand what this patch has to do with Cygwin since Cygwin
> vinschen> supports symbolc links since
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:42:24AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:09:18PM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> > Here is a revised patch for DOS (and other platforms that don't
> > support symbolic links). With this patch openssl-0.9.7 snapshot from
> > 19 April 2002 compiles
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Oh and, btw., current Cygwin is 1.3.10, 1.3.11 coming soon. Why are
> you testing with a version which is almost a year old?
It was just what was installed on my machine. I hadn't updated in a
while. Thanks for the reminder. I am now at 1.3.10.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:40:56AM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > Oh and, btw., current Cygwin is 1.3.10, 1.3.11 coming soon. Why are
> > you testing with a version which is almost a year old?
>
> It was just what was installed on my machine. I h
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 Apr 2002
21:06:16 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Lutz.Jaenicke> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:40:56AM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
Lutz.Jaenicke> > It was just what was installed on my machine. I hadn't updated in a
Lutz.Jaenicke> > while. Tha
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:40:56AM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > > Oh and, btw., current Cygwin is 1.3.10, 1.3.11 coming soon. Why are
> > > you testing with a version which is almost a year old?
>
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:40:56AM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> > > On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh and, btw., current Cygwin is 1.3.10, 1.3.11 coming soon. Why are
> > > >
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21 Apr
2002 22:20:53 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dkaufman> > gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_CYGWIN32
-DOPENSSL_THREADS -DDSO_WIN32 -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5
-DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN -fomi
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> Not just "can be fixed". That is what you have to do when you have
> changed the configuration, period.
The patch I submitted got around the problem by making the header files
available even when the algorithm was excluded, so "make de
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:21:42AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> dkaufman> After running "make depend", the next error is due to lack
> dkaufman> of "bn_sub_part_words". This was addressed in my patch for
> dkaufman> both DJGPP and Cygwin.
>
> Ah, so that's what that is about.
>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 10:11:08AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> gcc -o openssl -DMONOLITH -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_CYGWIN32
>-DOPENSSL_THREADS -DDSO_WIN32 -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DTERMIOS -DL_ENDIAN
>-fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -m486 -Wall openssl.o verify.o asn1pars.o req.o dgst.o dh.o
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > ../libcrypto.a(bn_mul.o)(.text+0x44b):bn_mul.c: undefined reference to
>`bn_sub_part_words'
> > [...]
> >
> > so it's pretty generic.
>
> The problem is line 61 in crypto/bn/bn_mul.c:
>
> #if defined(OPENSSL_NO_ASM) || !(defined(__i386) || de
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 07:51:27AM -0700, Doug Kaufman wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > > ../libcrypto.a(bn_mul.o)(.text+0x44b):bn_mul.c: undefined reference to
>`bn_sub_part_words'
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > so it's pretty generic.
> >
> > The problem is line 61 in cry
Hmm, out of curiosity, Ulf Moeller made a change to Configure
(revisions 1.328 and 1.314.2.12) that affects Cygwin. Could it be
that his change fixes this problem?
Note that I haven't addressed the DJGPP issue yet, only Cygwin.
[jaenicke - Thu Apr 25 17:31:12 2002]:
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - T
[levitte - Thu May 30 08:00:40 2002]:
> Hmm, out of curiosity, Ulf Moeller made a change to Configure
> (revisions 1.328 and 1.314.2.12) that affects Cygwin. Could it be
> that his change fixes this problem?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] just confirmed that Cygwin now has no problems.
> Note that I haven
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:00:43AM +0200, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
>
> Hmm, out of curiosity, Ulf Moeller made a change to Configure
> (revisions 1.328 and 1.314.2.12) that affects Cygwin. Could it be
> that his change fixes this problem?
I'm getting the following message in link stage n
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 30 May 2002 09:34:04
+0200, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
vinschen> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:00:43AM +0200, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
vinschen> >
vinschen> > Hmm, out of curiosity, Ulf Moeller made a change to Configure
vinschen> > (rev
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:30:10AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> vinschen> I'm getting the following message in link stage now when building
> vinschen> from current CVS:
> vinschen>
> vinschen> gcc -shared -o cygcrypto.dll -Wl,-Bsymbolic -Wl,--whole-archive
>libcrypto.a -W
> vin
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 30 May 2002 11:01:53
+0200, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
vinschen> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:30:10AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
wrote:
vinschen> > vinschen> I'm getting the following message in link stage now when building
vinschen
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 11:33:42AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 30 May 2002 11:01:53
>+0200, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> vinschen> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:30:10AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
>wrote:
> vinsche
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 30 May 2002 13:33:51
+0200, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Thank you!
vinschen> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 11:33:42AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
wrote:
vinschen> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 30 May 2002
11:01:53 +0200, Cori
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> I'd like to know what state the DJGPP support is at right now.
> Since the large patch for DJGPP support that was sent to openssl-dev
> some time ago never made it into the ticket database, I'm a bit
> unsure about what to do with it.
>
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 30 May
2002 07:54:17 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dkaufman> I'll try to review the patch this weekend and resubmit. I presume
dkaufman> you mean the patch for 0.9.7, or would you like the patch for 0.9.6
dkaufman> resubmitted also? Th
27 matches
Mail list logo
