Hi!
It seems that some hours ago some more or nice person (or software)
sent out a virus using my email address:
* The From: line is wrong:
From: "Lutz.Jaenicke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
My full name (which is always inserted by mutt :-) does not contain
a dot.
* The User-Agent: Header is missin
Yeah, wasn't saying it was anything you did; just bugs me when people do that crap.
I am not really easy to affect either, since I use a crappy graphical mail client
under Linux; nonetheless, I understand quite a few people on this list may use OE or
similar.
David Bronaugh
___
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 01:36:56AM -0700, David Bronaugh wrote:
> Yeah, wasn't saying it was anything you did; just bugs me when people do that crap.
My comment wasn't targeted at you.
As I do post to this list quite often and as a member of the openssl
developers team I felt that I should give a
Hey there,
> > I am not really easy to affect either, since I use a crappy graphical
> > mail client under Linux; nonetheless, I understand quite a few people on
> > this list may use OE or similar.
>
> I am afraid that this statement is quite correct :-(
I would personally +1 any proposal to ha
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> I would personally +1 any proposal to have the listserver block any posts
> that;
> (a) contain attachments
> (b) aren't ASCII (ie. block HTML, RTF, etc)
>
> Anyone needing to distribute files can find some other legitimate way to do
> it.
Attach
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:46:58AM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 01:36:56AM -0700, David Bronaugh wrote:
> > Yeah, wasn't saying it was anything you did; just bugs me when people do that crap.
>
> My comment wasn't targeted at you.
> As I do post to this list quite often a
Behalf Of Doug Kaufman
Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2002 12:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Virus/Faked email addresses
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> I would personally +1 any proposal to have the listserver block any posts
> that;
> (a) contain attachments
> (b)
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 09:06:01AM +1000, Steven Reddie wrote:
> Perhaps blocking attachments on the current lists, and setting up an
> additional openssl-patches list that accepts attachments would work. Most
> people would not bother subscribing to the patches list anyway.
>
> Steven
>
>
