Stephen (et al),
I checked the previous posting about the announcement from the Department of Commerce
on 12 January, .. and it would seem that my recount from Tuesday was correct:
(http://204.193.246.62/public.nsf/docs/60D6B47456BB389F852568640078B6C0)
>Global Exports of Unrestricted Encrypti
[ On Wednesday, January 12, 2000 at 04:54:32 (PST), Joel Yarde wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: DLLs for Openssl 0.9.4
>
> One question though, am I correct in assuming that the library files are
> meant for MS Visual C++? (I'm using version 5.0).
Yes. The .lib and .exp have been produced with VC++ 6.0
FYI
Eric S. Johansson[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was composed almost entirely using NaturallySpeaking
--- begin forwarded text
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ACLU/EFF/EPIC Say Crypto Regs Still Unconstitutional
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:23:22 -0800
From: John Gilmor
I was just thinking about Microsoft and their CryptoAPI. They ship a
lot of documentation and sample code to all the world via the web and
the MSDN distributions and don't seem to have any problems with US
authorities (well not in this case anyway;-))
To me it seems like documentation and sampl
> Steve Wrote:
> This is one area that will be updated in OpenSSL 0.9.5. There is an
> 'smime' application in the 0.9.5 development release and a simpler API
> that does most of the hard work. That might be a good place to start.
>
For the pkcs7 function in openssl, what does it do exactly for
> the command perl util/mk1mf.pl 32 libeay
>
> produces
>
> BIO_number_read does not have a number assigned
> BIO_number_written does not have a number assigned
> X509_STORE_CTX_rget_chain does not have a number assigned
>
> this doesn't seem right to me.
They'll get numbers assigned the next
> Anyone there have any information on generation of client certificates with openssl?
>I can generate them (albeit only for Netscrape at the moment - IE doesn't seem to be
>playing ball) but Netscape won't verify them claiming it's not certified for email.
Check to see the CA that has certifie
Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> Jason Stanford wrote:
> >
> > You could simply use the OpenSSH package (www.openssh.org) which has
> > both a secure "telnet" client (ssh) and secure copy (scp). There are
> > some ftp packages that support one-time passwords, but I've not been so
> > unhappy with scp to inv
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
>
> There is another issue as well whatever the interpretation of the laws
> some companies and organisations take an ultra cautious line.
>
> For example one organisation at one point was considering not using
> OpenSSL because there was a (false) rumour that the OpenSS
> dsr> RANDFILE= %USERPROFILE%\.rnd
> dsr> oid_file= %USERPROFILE%\.oid
> dsr>
> dsr> This would point to the users home dir under NT.
>
> Really? Have you tested that? I dunno, but if I were you, I'd
> replace "%USERPROFILE%" with "$ENV::USERPROFILE"...
>
Yes,
Anyone there have any information on generation of client certificates with openssl? I
can generate them (albeit only for Netscrape at the moment - IE doesn't seem to be
playing ball) but Netscape won't verify them claiming it's not certified for email.
What am I doing wrong? I've read the FAQ
Just thought I'd share this with the
list...
QUOTE
Any encryption commodity or software, including
components, of any key length can now be exported under a license exception
after a technical review to any non-government end-user in any country except
for the seven state supporters of t
Ulf Möller wrote on Thu, Jan 13 2000 (14:20:28 +0100):
> It works all right on Debian Linux. I'd recommend to set a breakpoint
> in BF_cfb64_encrypt and single-step through it, but it may well be a
> RedHat bug.
thank you for the effort.
stepping through BF_cfb64_encrypt, but it doesn't make any
Peter Sylvester wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the command perl util/mk1mf.pl 32 libeay
>
> produces
>
> BIO_number_read does not have a number assigned
> BIO_number_written does not have a number assigned
> X509_STORE_CTX_rget_chain does not have a number assigned
>
> this doesn't seem right to me.
Sin
Hi Jan,
> Sorry I did not read the entire "openssl desperately needs some intro
docs"
> thread (busy busy busy), just wanted to ask if the effort would still be
> appreciated?
Very much! An understandable but complete introduction would be very useful
(at least to me).
Sander Steffann.
__
Here's my situation:
I have a setup where all private keys (encrypted) and certificates are
stored in a directory service from where I retrieve them. So I don't
have files where the things are kept.
Now I want to do certification verification when establishing SSL
connections. The certification
Toni Andjelkovic wrote:
> appears to work well except on redhat 6.1, where the
> "send" part will dump core.
It works all right on Debian Linux. I'd recommend to set a breakpoint
in BF_cfb64_encrypt and single-step through it, but it may well be a
RedHat bug.
Hi,
the command perl util/mk1mf.pl 32 libeay
produces
BIO_number_read does not have a number assigned
BIO_number_written does not have a number assigned
X509_STORE_CTX_rget_chain does not have a number assigned
this doesn't seem right to me.
___
hi all,
well am willing to assist in writing the docs..
previous wrote.. the following howtos and would
use as basis to write the openssl ones..
a- IPFWADM FAQ
b- FIREWALL1 - FAQ
c- SSH 1.xx original FAQ(custodian)
d - INND FAQ
e - SED FAQ
well the offers there anyhow..
must admit no veter
ryoko> %./config gcc$B!!(B( or config )
ryoko> Operating system: sun4m-sun-solaris2
ryoko> This system (solaris-sparcv8-gcc) is not supported. See file INSTALL for detail
ryoko>
ryoko> Do I have to define hardware,operating system?
ryoko> Or can't sun4m use OpenSSL0.9.4?
ryoko> (I could install
Unfortunately its not likely a Canadian company could make any real
challenge in the US or SA.
Entrust may be trying to protect themselves as they have set up their own
CA based on the chaining Thawtes root rather than looking out for the good
of the market ...
Jeff
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Joe A
> (anyone wanting to supply a green card for the experiment would be my hero forever)
I know you were being humorous, but are you actually seeking to work in the US?
Bill Michaelson
__
OpenSSL Project
Ulf Möller wrote on Thu, Jan 13 2000 (01:24:31 +0100):
> Please post compilable source code and specify which OpenSSL version
> you are using.
i'm using OpenSSL 0.9.4 09 Aug 1999
i attach the code, it encrypts the client's stdin
with blowfish cfb64, and sends it to the server's stdout
using a si
From: "Eric S. Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
esj> Global Exports of Unrestricted Encryption Source Code
esj>
esj> Encryption source code which is available to the public and
esj> which is not subject to an express agreement for the payment of
esj> a licensing fee or royalty for commercial
Hello,
I have read the draft posted on 12/10/1999 & discussion draft II
12/17/1999. What i have understood is that regulations on 64 bits
confidentiality algorithms will be lifted. So in laymans terms concerning
mass marketing companies can have upto 64 bits crypto please do correct me
if i have
25 matches
Mail list logo
