Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
> 
> There is another issue as well whatever the interpretation of the laws
> some companies and organisations take an ultra cautious line.
> 
> For example one organisation at one point was considering not using
> OpenSSL because there was a (false) rumour that the OpenSSL group had
> encouraged anonymous contributions from US citizens.
> 
> Steve.
> --

Still, documentation provided by US citizens, distributed through a
website or mailing list *not* operated by the openssl team might be
an option.

When that would happen, would the openssl team provide assistance,
i.e. answer questions posted here from documentation writers?

-- 
Niels Poppe - org.net bv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to