Greetings,
I'm running Debian testing.
I have a machine with two static IPs, presently on one NIC using a virtual
interface. I'd like to make two self-signed certs, one per IP. Is this
possible given that the machine only has one hostname?
If it matters, the two IPs differ by just the last dig
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas J. Hruska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: OpenSSL as part of OpenSA using Windows 2000
> At 08:33 AM 11/5/2004 +, Mike Hart writeth:
> >Hello
> >
> >I have OpenSA 1.0.4 Installed on
At 08:33 AM 11/5/2004 +, Mike Hart writeth:
>Hello
>
>I have OpenSA 1.0.4 Installed on a Windows 2000 Server, there is a
>Denial of Service vulnerability with the OpenSSL 0.9.6g portion of
>this installation that requires OpenSSL to be upgraded to OpenSSL
>0.9.7d or 0.9.6m. There seems to be no
You are seriously lost. Private keys and public keys (certificates) are
USED in performing RSA encryption, but they are not themselves encoded
and/or transmitted under RSA encryption. Yes, keys for private-key
encryption are sent under public key encryption, but
a key for private key encryption i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
one silly question: if I generate a request with
openssl req -new -keyout mykey.pem -out myreq.pem 265
the private key in mykey.pem is encrypted or not?
Since my openssl asks me for a password when using "openssl req -new -keyout mykey.pe
Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>> one silly question: if I generate a request with
>> openssl req -new -keyout mykey.pem -out myreq.pem 265
>> the private key in mykey.pem is encrypted or not?
>>
> Since my openssl asks me for a password when using "openssl req -new -keyout
> mykey.pem -out myreq.pem"
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 05 Nov 2004 15:51:36 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
andrea> one silly question: if I generate a request with
andrea>
andrea> openssl req -new -keyout mykey.pem -out myreq.pem 265
andrea>
andrea> the private key in mykey.pem is encrypted or not?
It's enc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
one silly question: if I generate a request with
openssl req -new -keyout mykey.pem -out myreq.pem 265
the private key in mykey.pem is encrypted or not?
Since my openssl asks me for a password when using "openssl req -new
-keyout mykey.pem -out myreq.pem", I'd think
Hi,
one silly question: if I generate a request with
openssl req -new -keyout mykey.pem -out myreq.pem 265
the private key in mykey.pem is encrypted or not?
The questions arises because I have the need of encrypt VNC traffic between a remote
and virtually unreachable server and a client using
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:22:35 -0500, "Ronald I. Nutter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ronald_nutter> Is anybody getting this or is OpenSSL a dead product ?
ronald_nutter> Is there a listserv somewhere that may be able to help
ronald_nutter> me ?
OpenSSL is a live product
Did you try "openssl ca" instead of ca.all ?
Directories seem to be invalid because it retrurns "no file found" errors !
Personnaly, I haven't tried the perl script, I use only openssl ca
Frederic
Ronald I. Nutter wrote:
Is anybody getting this or is OpenSSL a dead product ? Is there a
listserv so
Hello
I have OpenSA 1.0.4 Installed on a Windows 2000 Server, there is a
Denial of Service vulnerability with the OpenSSL 0.9.6g portion of
this installation that requires OpenSSL to be upgraded to OpenSSL
0.9.7d or 0.9.6m. There seems to be no further upgrades available for
OpenSA that include up
12 matches
Mail list logo
