From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Jeffrey Walton
Sent: Wednesday, 21 October, 2009 18:09
Just a few small tweaks:
First, generate the domain parameters:
openssl ecparam -genkey -name secp160k1 -out c:\key.pem
Next, strip the PBE:
openssl ec -in c:\key.pem -out
According to http://openssl.org/docs/apps/s_client.html, s_client does
not support HTTP proxy. Is there any plan for s_client to support HTTP
proxy so that we can use s_client inside firewall?
__
OpenSSL Project
I check http://openssl.org/docs/apps/s_client.html, and it does not
support HTTP proxy right now. Is there any plan for s_client to
support HTTP proxy?
Thank you!
-Bo
__
OpenSSL Project
According to http://openssl.org/docs/apps/s_client.html, s_client does
not support HTTP proxy right now. Is there any plan for s_client to
support HTTP proxy?
__
OpenSSL Project
Darryl Miles wrote:
But this flag (while documented to the contrary) does nothing inside
libssl. So yes the documentation says you should set it, prove to me
that OpenSSL behaves in a different way because you set it.
One of the biggest downsides of open source software is that encourages
David Schwartz wrote:
Darryl Miles wrote:
But this flag (while documented to the contrary) does nothing inside
libssl. So yes the documentation says you should set it, prove to me
that OpenSSL behaves in a different way because you set it.
One of the biggest downsides of open source
David Schwartz wrote:
Darryl Miles wrote:
This is how everything else works, it's odd to say it's somehow a limitation
of OpenSSL that it works the same way everything else works. Try to read to
a string in one thread while you write to it from another. The general rule
of thread
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 03:47:51PM +0100, Darryl Miles wrote:
I advocate that some users would find it useful to be able to invoke
SSL_read() and SSL_write() from exactly two threads on the same 'SSL *'
simultaneously. There is merit in this and as things stands OpenSSL does
not allow it
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Thomas Harning Jr.
thomas.harn...@trustbearer.com wrote:
I'm writing a browser and a library that use OpenSSL for cryptography
(correction - browser plugin)
support. I want to best be able to fully cleanup state when my
plugin/library is unloaded, however it
Now the next question you might want to ask, is it
allowed for
exactly two threads to operate specifically the
SSL_read() and
SSL_write() on the _SAME_ 'SSL *' instance at the same
time ? My
understanding would be that the answer is
NO. This is a limitation in
the OpenSSL
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:50:38AM -0700, Jason Pettiss wrote:
However, it's clearly alright to read a socket from one thread while
writing a socket from another: indeed, this is the purpose of a socket.
That OpenSSL doesn't allow this usage seems like a limitation of the
library. (Although
I advocate that some users would find it useful to be
able to invoke
SSL_read() and SSL_write() from exactly two threads on
the same 'SSL *'
simultaneously. There is merit in this and as
things stands OpenSSL does
not allow it due to a design choice (aka design
limitation).
You
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:15:35AM -0700, Jason Pettiss wrote:
We could take turns sending discrete pieces of each file but that's silly and
slow.
Assuming we can load these gigantic files into memory to make the example
simpler, we could both do this to write:
It is possible to use
Hi All,
Working with legacy code, a RSA private key's modulus and exponent are
saved to a file (i.e. two array of c-structures).
Is there anyway I can create pem format of the Private key its modulus
and exponent parts?
Many thanks in advance,
--B
It is possible to use non-blocking SSL_read() SSL_write()
calls that
are interleaved, but not without a mutex or a separate
thread that
owns all SSL I/O that consumes requests to read/write.
It is simpler to use two SSL connections. SSL is a
state-machine, not a pipe.
Awesome the former
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:34:22AM -0700, Jason Pettiss wrote:
It is possible to use non-blocking SSL_read() SSL_write() calls that
are interleaved, but not without a mutex or a separate thread that
owns all SSL I/O that consumes requests to read/write.
It is simpler to use two SSL
Darryl Miles wrote:
Kernel objects are the exception, only because we cannot allow a
program
(broken or valid) to screw up kernel objects. So the kernel has no
choice
but to overserialize.
FYI modern kernel's do not need to serialize (let alone
overserialize,
whatever that means,
Hello,
please, can you direct me to some documentation which explains how to
set timeout on client's SSL_connect(SSL *session).
I tried select() but was not able to make it work.
SSL Client is on UNIX HP11.11 uses openssl-0.9.8k
Server is Apache 1.3.41 on UNIX HP11.11 OpenSSL 0.9.8e.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009, Adam Rosenstein wrote:
I'm using v1.0.0 Beta 3.
Hmm... there seems to be an SKID/AKID issue here:
There is also a bug in the verification code which means it was expecting to
find a CRL for the CRL signing
19 matches
Mail list logo
