On 5/29/2012 8:56 PM, Jeremy Farrell wrote:
From: Jakob Bohm [mailto:jb-open...@wisemo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 8:34 AM
On 5/27/2012 2:29 AM, Jeremy Farrell wrote:
From: Jakob Bohm [mailto:jb-open...@wisemo.com]
On 5/25/2012 5:30 PM, Ken Goldman wrote:
On 5/25/2012 3:33 AM, Jakob Bohm
Hi,
I'm running into a deadlock using openssl 1.0.0h. it's a
multi-threaded ssl proxy based on openssl and libevent, but i think
the problem is much more related to openssl than libevent.
there are 4 worker threads (5, 4, 3, 2), 1 external report thread (6),
i think we can ignore this one, and 1
On Wed, May 30, 2012, Zhuang Yuyao wrote:
Hi,
I'm running into a deadlock using openssl 1.0.0h. it's a
multi-threaded ssl proxy based on openssl and libevent, but i think
the problem is much more related to openssl than libevent.
[snip]
Thread 5 (Thread 0x7f2b9e93c950 (LWP 1281)):
#0
Hi,
ok. It seem to me that I am not the only one who expects different results with
the BN_FLG_CONSTIME flag. I measured the time only of the BN_nnmod function in
the BN_mod_add function. The BN_add function, which is executed before the
BN_nnmod function, maybe needs more time, because it has
Quick question for the group? I am running Apache 2.2.22 with OpenSSL
1.0.1c installed. This machine formerly had 1.0.0d and I am noticing that
the apache logs are stating that OpenSSL is still at the earlier version.
However when I do an openSSL version command it responds saying I am at
the
I have compiled the openssl-fips module, all is good so far. I am
getting ready to attempt the openssl 0.9.8w portion again. With that in
mind, what is your take on the below:
At this point a full OpenSSL library has been installed. However, the
special distribution required
to generate the
On Wed, May 30, 2012, Brewster, Scott wrote:
I am not sure how I should interpret this - do I expand the 0.9.8w tar
file into the same directory as were I did the openssl-fips? Do I just
expand 0.9.8w.tar into its own directory and proceed with the config
fips, make and make install steps
The results from the openssl-fips step:
[root@pdclab01] /usr/local/ssl/fips-1.0/bin # ./openssl version
OpenSSL FIPS Object Module v1.2
Good so far. The results from
Config fips
Make
Make install
On openssl 0.9.8w:
[root@pdclab01] /usr/local/ssl/fips/bin # ./openssl version
exec(): 0509-036
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:45:46AM -0400, bhorow...@vai.net wrote:
Quick question for the group? I am running Apache 2.2.22 with OpenSSL
1.0.1c installed. This machine formerly had 1.0.0d and I am noticing that
the apache logs are stating that OpenSSL is still at the earlier version.
I am trying to test via padlock using 'openssl speed -engine padlock', but it
fails.
# openssl version
OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012
# openssl engine padlock
140291115067048:error:260B606D:engine routines:DYNAMIC_LOAD:init
failed:eng_dyn.c:521:
140291115067048:error:2606A074:engine
Are you combining version 1.0.1 and 1.0.0 ?
From: salatiel.fi...@gmail.com
Subject: Can not enable via padlock
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:26:45 -0300
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
I am trying to test via padlock using 'openssl speed -engine padlock',
The problem is fixed after applying the patch. Thanks very much.
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012, Zhuang Yuyao wrote:
Hi,
I'm running into a deadlock using openssl 1.0.0h. it's a
multi-threaded ssl proxy based on openssl and
On 2012-05-28 16:53 +0300 (Mon), Chinmaya Ku. Dwibedy wrote:
We are using OpenSSL (0.9.7a) command and the auxiliary tools on RHEL4
to X509 V3 certificate. Can anyone please clarify whether this version 3
certificate is compliant with RFC- 5280? Thanks in advance for your
valuable feedback.
13 matches
Mail list logo
